Burnout in Digital Era: The Role of ICT Demands, ICT Resources, and Digital Overload in Public Sector
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/smartsociety.v5i1.741Keywords:
Burnout, Digital overload, ICT demands, ICT resources, Public sectorAbstract
The increasing integration of digital technologies in public sector work has transformed how employees interact, access information, and perform tasks. While this digital transformation offers efficiency and flexibility, it also introduces new forms of work-related pressure, such as information overload, frequent interruptions, and the need for constant availability. Within the framework of the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model, these factors are categorized as ICT demands and ICT resources. The present study investigates how these two dimensions influence employee burnout, while also exploring the mediating role of digital overload in this relationship. Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 358 employees in Indonesia’s public education sector and analyzed through structural equation modeling. The findings show that ICT demands have a significant positive effect on both digital overload and burnout, while ICT resources have a significant negative effect on both outcomes. Furthermore, digital overload partially mediates the relationship between both ICT demands and ICT resources with burnout. These results emphasize the dual role of digital technology in shaping employee well-being: while excessive ICT demands can lead to overload and burnout, adequate ICT resources can serve as protective factors. This highlights the importance of balancing digital expectations with supportive infrastructure to promote sustainable and healthy work environments in the public sector.
References
Abdulkareem, A. K., Ishola, A. A., Bello, M. L., & Adejumo, A. (2024). The dark side of digitalization: examining the impact of digital overload on job autonomy and job satisfaction. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 22(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-07-2023-0091
Abu Farha, A. K., Obeidat, S. M., & Al-Kwifi, O. S. (2022). ICT effect on employees-related outcomes: higher education as a context. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 24(1), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-04-2021-0073
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands-Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Euwema, M. C. (2005). Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10(2), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.2.170
Baumeister, V. M., Kuen, L. P., Bruckes, M., & Schewe, G. (2021). The Relationship of Work-Related ICT Use With Well-being, Incorporating the Role of Resources and Demands: A Meta-Analysis. SAGE Open, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211061560
Cambier, R., Derks, D., & Vlerick, P. (2019). Detachment from work: A diary study on telepressure, smartphone use and empathy. Psychologica Belgica, 59(1), 227–245. https://doi.org/10.5334/pb.477
Chen, A., & Karahanna, E. (2018). Life interrupted: The effects of technology-mediated work interruptions on work and nonwork outcomes. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 42(4), 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2018/13631
Day, A., Scott, N., & Kelloway, E. K. (2010). Information and communication technology: Implications for job stress and employee well-being. Research in Occupational Stress and Well Being, 8(2010), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3555(2010)0000008011
Deci, E. L. (2017). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination (Issue October 2015). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.05613-3
Demerouti, E., Nachreiner, F., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The Job Demands-Resources Model of Burnout. https://doi.org/10 10037//0021-9010 86 3 499
Grawitch, M. J., Werth, P. M., Palmer, S. N., Erb, K. R., & Lavigne, K. N. (2017). Self-imposed pressure or organizational norms? Further examination of the construct of workplace telepressure. Stress and Health, 34(2), 306–319. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2792
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis, Multivariate Data Analysis. In Book (Vol. 87, Issue 4). www.cengage.com/highered
Hwang, M. Y., Hong, J. C., Tai, K. H., Chen, J. T., & Gouldthorp, T. (2020). The relationship between the online social anxiety, perceived information overload and fatigue, and job engagement of civil servant LINE users. Government Information Quarterly, 37(1), 101423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101423
Karimikia, H., Singh, H., & Joseph, D. (2021). Negative outcomes of ICT use at work: meta-analytic evidence and the role of job autonomy. Internet Research, 31(1), 159–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-09-2019-0385
Lingo, E. L. (2023). Digital Curation and Creative Brokering: Managing information overload in open organizing. Organization Studies, 44(1), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406221099697
Marsh, E., Perez Vallejos, E., & Spence, A. (2024). Overloaded by Information or Worried About Missing Out on It: A Quantitative Study of Stress, Burnout, and Mental Health Implications in the Digital Workplace. SAGE Open, 14(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241268830
Martin, L., Hauret, L., & Fuhrer, C. (2022). Digitally transformed home office impacts on job satisfaction, job stress and job productivity. COVID-19 findings. PLoS ONE, 17(3 March), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265131
Molino, M., Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Manuti, A., Giancaspro, M. L., Russo, V., Zito, M., & Cortese, C. G. (2020). Wellbeing costs of technology use during Covid-19 remote working: An investigation using the Italian translation of the technostress creators scale. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(15), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12155911
Ndumu, A. (2020). Disrupting Digital Divide Narratives: Exploring the U.S. Black Diasporic Immigrant Context. Open Information Science, 4(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2020-0006
Ninaus, K., Diehl, S., & Terlutter, R. (2021). Employee perceptions of information and communication technologies in work life, perceived burnout, job satisfaction and the role of work-family balance. Journal of Business Research, 136(August 2020), 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.007
Obasi, I. C., & Benson, C. (2025). The Impact of Digitalization and Information and Communication Technology on the Nature and Organization of Work and the Emerging Challenges for Occupational Safety and Health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22030362
Rasool, T., Warraich, N. F., & Sajid, M. (2022). Examining the Impact of Technology Overload at the Workplace: A Systematic Review. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221114320
Ray, T. K., & Pana-Cryan, R. (2021). Work flexibility and work-related well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063254
Ruiner, C., Debbing, C. E., Hagemann, V., Schaper, M., Klumpp, M., & Hesenius, M. (2023). Job demands and resources when using technologies at work – development of a digital work typology. Employee Relations, 45(1), 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-11-2021-0468
Schaufeli, W. B., De Witte, H., & Desart, S. (2020). Burnout Assessment Tool. July, 1–143.
Tarafdar, M., Cooper, C. L., & Stich, J. (2019). The technostress trifecta ‐ techno eustress, techno distress and design: Theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 6–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169
Tarafdar, M., Tu, Q., Ragu-Nathan, B. S., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2007). The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1), 301–328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109
United Nations. (2024). E-Government Survey 2024. https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2024
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal retain all of the copyrights in their work. Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal, collaborates with with researchers from many countries as the Editors and the Advisory International Editorial Board make every effort to ensure that no wrong or misleading data, opinions, or statements are published in the journal. In any way, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal ( e-ISSN: 2807-5757 ) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Authors who publish with Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal agree to the following terms:
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA).
Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
