Anti-Doping Monitoring Web-Based Android for Athletes Disabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jcss.v3i2.500Keywords:
Anti-doping, DBR, Doping in sports, Monitoring, Paralympic.Abstract
The usage of doping has been banned in the world of sports. This ban is regulated by law and must be adhered to by all athletes. This research aimed to identify the need for efforts to prevent doping use and develop a monitoring tool for doping prevention. The method used in this research was DESIGN-Based Research (DBR), covering the analysis, design, development, and reflection stages. The data sources involved in this research were administrators, medical officers, coaches, and disabled athletes from the NPCI (National Paralympic Committee Indonesia) Central Java Province. Data collection techniques employed were questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The reflection stage included the validation or assessment of the product by doping experts, medical professionals, and media experts. The data obtained from this research and development were both qualitative and quantitative. Experts in the field used Aiken's V coefficient to test the validity. The product received an Aiken V value of 0.92 from doping and medical experts and 0.82 from media experts in the expert validation results. This value indicated that the experts considered the product highly valid. With the development, this product is expected to fulfill the needs of doping prevention efforts. Further research is needed to assess the effectiveness of this product in preventing the use of doping among athletes with disabilities.References
Adami, P. E., Koutlianos, N., Baggish, A., Bermon, S., Cavarretta, E., Deligiannis, A., Furlanello, F., Kouidi, E., Marques-Vidal, P., Niebauer, J., Pelliccia, A., Sharma, S., Solberg, E. E., Stuart, M., & Papadakis, M. (2022). Cardiovascular effects of doping substances, commonly prescribed medications and ergogenic aids in relation to sports: A position statement of the sport cardiology and exercise nucleus of the European Association of Preventive Cardiology. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 29(3), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwab198
Ahmed, A. A. (2023). The use of gamification in language teaching and education: A content analysis study. Journal of Philology and Educational Sciences, 2(2), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.53898/jpes2023223
Aiken, L. R. (1980). Content validity and reliability of single items or questionnaires. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(4), 955–959. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000419
Albano, G. D., Amico, F., Cocimano, G., Liberto, A., Maglietta, F., Esposito, M., Rosi, G. L., Di Nunno, N., Salerno, M., & Montana, A. (2021). Review adverse effects of anabolic-androgenic steroids: A literature review. Healthcare (Switzerland), 9(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9010097
Backhouse, S. H. (2023). A behaviourally informed approach to reducing the risk of inadvertent anti-doping rule violations from supplement use. Sports Medicine, 53(Suppl 1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-023-01933-x
Bird, S. R., Goebel, C., Burke, L. M., & Greaves, R. F. (2016). Doping in sport and exercise: Anabolic, ergogenic, health and clinical issues. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry, 53(2), 196–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004563215609952
Blank, C., Flatscher-Thöni, M., Gatterer, K., Happ, E., Schobersberger, W., & Stühlinger, V. (2021). Doping sanctions in sport: Knowledge and perception of (legal) consequences of doping—an explorative study in Austria. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12), 603. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14120603
Bolisani, E., & Bratianu, C. (2018). The elusive definition of knowledge. In Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60657-6_1
Boszkiewicz, K., Piwowar, A., & Petryszyn, P. (2022). Aromatase inhibitors and risk of metabolic and cardiovascular adverse effects in breast cancer patients—a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11113133
Castañón-Rodríguez, J., & Quiroga, S. R. (2024). Linguistic notes on the globalization of Spanish sport in Asia. Journal of Coaching and Sports Science, 3(1), 50–59. https://doi.org/10.58524/002024333900
Clancy, S., Owusu-Sekyere, F., Shelley, J., Veltmaat, A., Maria, A., & Petróczi, A. (2022). The role of personal commitment to integrity in clean sport and anti-doping. Performance Enhancement & Health, 10(4), 100232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.peh.2022.100232
Denham, B. E. (2017). When contaminated dietary supplements cause positive drug tests: Methylhexaneamine as a doping agent in sport. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 9(4), 677–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2017.1348963
Diastuti, K., Diani, R., Saregar, A., Anugrah, A., & Fitri, M. R. (2024). Blended project-based learning model on 21st century skills: A qualitative content analysis. Journal of Philology and Educational Sciences, 3(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.53898/jpes2024315
Doewes, R. I., Elumalai, G., Azmi, S. H., Hendarto, S., & Ramdhani, R. N. (2021). Rumi doping application development as anti-doping information media for Indonesian national paralympic comittee Athletes. Bali Medical Journal, 10(3), 918–924. https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v10i3.2781
Doewes, R. I., Prasetyo, H. J., Adi, P. W., Hendarto, S., Sabarini, S. S., & Listiani, D. (2020). Doping understanding survey on the Indonesian Asean Paragames Athletes and Coaches of 2020. Solid State Technology, 63(6).
Doll, W. J., Deng, X., Raghunathan, T. S., Torkzadeh, G., & Xia, W. (2004). The meaning and measurement of user satisfaction: A multigroup invariance analysis of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(1), 227–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2004.11045789
Fitria, F., & Hidayah, N. (2021). POGIL (Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning) learning model: How does it influence students’ observation skills and scientific attitudes? Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v1i1.6
García-Martí, C., Ospina-Betancurt, J., Asensio-Castañeda, E., & Chamorro, J. L. (2022). Study of an anti-doping education program in Spanish sports sciences students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316324
Harriss, D., & Atkinson, G. (2015). Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2016 update. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 36(14), 1121–1124. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1565186
Harriss, D. J., MacSween, A., & Atkinson, G. (2019). Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research: 2020 update. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 40(13), 813–817. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1015-3123
Harriss, D., Macsween, A., & Atkinson, G. (2017). Standards for ethics in sport and exercise science research: 2018 update. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 38(14), 1126–1131. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-124001
Hon, O., Kuipers, H., & Bottenburg, M. (2015). Prevalence of doping use in elite sports: a review of numbers and methods. Sports Medicine, 45, 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0247-x
IADO. (2022a). Peraturan anti-doping IADO. IADO.
IADO. (2022b). Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE) application form (pp. 1–9).
Jacobsson, J., Ekberg, J., Timpka, T., Haggren Råsberg, L., Sjöberg, M., Mirkovic, D., & Nilsson, S. (2020). Developing web‐based health guidance for coaches and parents in child athletics (track and field). Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 30(7), 1248–1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13661
Kayser, B., Mauron, A., & Miah, A. (2007). Current anti-doping policy: A critical appraisal. BMC Medical Ethics, 8, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-8-2
Kemenpora. (2022). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia nomor 11 tahun 2022 tentang keolahragaan. In UU No 11 pasal 6.
Kornia, E., Komikesari, H., & Saregar, A. (2022). Trends, challenges, and opportunities for Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) as the future of education in science learning. Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v2i1.109
Krishnan, A., Datta, K., Sharma, D., Das Sharma, S., Mahajan, U., Jhajharia, S., & Yadav, M. (2022). Survey of antidoping knowledge, attitudes and practices amongst elite Indian sportsmen and the way forward. Medical Journal Armed Forces India, 78(1), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.03.020
Murofushi, Y., Kawata, Y., Kamimura, A., Hirosawa, M., & Shibata, N. (2018a). Impact of anti-doping education and doping control experience on anti-doping knowledge in Japanese university athletes: A cross-sectional study. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 13(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-018-0178-x
Murofushi, Y., Kawata, Y., Kamimura, A., Hirosawa, M., & Shibata, N. (2018b). Impact of anti-doping education and doping control experience on anti-doping knowledge in Japanese university athletes: A cross-sectional study. Substance Abuse: Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 13(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-018-0178-x
Noor, R. N. F., Zainuddin, Z., Misbah, M., Hartini, S., & Dewantara, D. (2022). Blended learning with schoology in impulse and momentum materials: The development of physics teaching materials. Online Learning In Educational Research (OLER), 1(2), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v1i2.47
Nuriev, A. (2019). Non-intentional anti-doping rule violations: Does a new trend in evidence provision suffice? The International Sports Law Journal, 19(3), 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-019-00158-3
Orr, R., Grassmayr, M., Macniven, R., Grunseit, A., Halaki, M., & Bauman, A. (2018). Australian athletes’ knowledge of the WADA Prohibited Substances List and performance enhancing substances. International Journal of Drug Policy, 56, 40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.02.025
Özkan, Ö., Torğutalp, Ş., Kara, Ö., Dönmez, G., Demirel, A. L. İ., Karanfil, Y., Yargiç, M., & Korkusuz, F. (2020). Doping knowledge and attitudes of Turkish athletes: A cross-sectional study. Montenegrin Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.26773/mjssm.200307
Pielke Jr, R., & Boye, E. (2019). Scientific integrity and anti-doping regulation. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(2), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/19406940.2019.1596968
Priadi, M. A., Marpaung, R. R. T., & Fatmawati, Y. (2021). Problem-based learning model with zoom breakout rooms application: Its impact on students’ scientific literacy. Online Learning In Educational Research (OLER), 1(2), 93–101. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v1i2.54
Rico-González, M., Los Arcos, A., Rojas-Valverde, D., Gómez-Carmona, C. D., & Pino-Ortega, J. (2023). Assessing the amount of data per second to measure tactical variables in team sports. Journal of Coaching and Sports Science, 2(2), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.58524/jcss.v2i2.240
Sepriani, R. (2023). Web-based anti-doping education: A needs analysis for achievement sport athletes. Journal Sport Area, 8(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2023.vol8(1).10457
Simon, R. L., Torres, C. R., & Hager, P. F. (2018). Fair play: The ethics of sport. Routledge. (Fourth Edi). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429492570
Star, S., & Kelly, S. (2021). A level playing field in anti-doping disputes? The need to scrutinize procedural fairness at first instance hearings. The International Sports Law Journal, 21(1), 94–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-020-00176-6
Suherman, S., Setiawan, R. H., Herdian, H., & Anggoro, B. S. (2021). 21st century STEM education: An increase in mathematical critical thinking skills and gender through technological integration. Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v1i2.29
Takahashi, M., Tatsugi, Y., & Kohno, T. (2007). Internet-based medical counseling for performance-enhancing drug abuse. Journal of the Medical Society of Toho University, 54(2), 115–119.
Vlad, R. A., Hancu, G., Popescu, G. C., & Lungu, I. A. (2018). Doping in sports, a never-ending story Advanced Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 8(4), 529–534. https://doi.org/10.15171/apb.2018.062
WADA. (2019). World anti‐doping code‐international standard.
WADA. (2021a). World anti-doping agency: The code 2021 (pp. 0–119).
WADA. (2021b). World anti-doping code 2021. World Anti-Doping Agency, 1–184.
WADA. (2023). World anti-doping program: 2020 Anti-Doping Rule Violation (ADRV) Report. May.
Woolway, T., Lazuras, L., Barkoukis, V., & Petróczi, A. (2020). Doing what is right and doing it right”: A mapping review of athletes’ perception of anti-doping legitimacy. International Journal of Drug Policy, 84, 102865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102865
Yani, A. D., Wati, M., & Misbah, M. (2021). Direct current electric teaching materials through google classroom for 16-17 years old students: Teacher perception. Online Learning In Educational Research (OLER), 1(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v1i1.17
Yuningsih, Y. Y. A., Farida, F., & Pratiwi, D. D. (2021). Schoology-based e-learning: The impact on concepts understanding and mathematical communication abilities. Online Learning In Educational Research (OLER), 1(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v1i2.60
Zhumabayeva, G., Kapanova, G., Vinnikov, D., Bakasheva, M., Abdulla, V., & Grjibovski, A. (2022). Knowledge and experience of Kazakhstan athletes in anti-doping and the impact of past educational intervention. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, 17(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-022-00461-7
