High school students’ mathematical representation ability: Evaluation of disposition based on mastery learning assessment model (MLAM)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v2i1.93Keywords:
Disposition, Misconception, MLAM, Representation.Abstract
Mathematical representation is the ability of students to explore and use mathematical ideas explicitly. This study aimed to learn about the effectiveness of the Mastery Learning Assessment Model (MLAM) in mathematics learning at the Assyfa Learning Center Foundation Pasuruan, which then described students' abilities in solving mathematical representation problems evaluated from mathematical dispositions. MLAM is based on repeating a similar assessment through an overhaul of mastery learning from previous researchers. This study used a descriptive qualitative method. In the study presented here, 20 subjects were pooled and surveyed using a continuous assessment tool based on high, low, and moderate math ability. The results showed that almost all students could use representational images to solve mathematical problems, create mathematical models, and solve problems related to mathematical expressions. On the other hand, most students could not complete the two indicators of mathematical representation, namely making sketches and mathematical models based on the given situation and data. This result is indicated by the 75 percent of students who completed this lesson. Based on the Teaching Evaluation (TER) results, most students are also satisfied with this approach. It is expected that the MLAM assessment can improve students' mathematical representation skills.
References
Abramovich, S., Grinshpan, A. Z., & Milligan, D. L. (2019). Teaching mathematics through concept motivation and action learning. Education Research International, 2019(1), 1–13.
Antika, L. T., Ibana, L., & Madura, U. I. (2018). Korelasi antara identifikasi miskonsepsi teori evolusi dan correlation between misconception identification of evolutionary theory and learning outcome of biological education students. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 3(2), 117–128.
Apriani, C. M. (2016). Analisis representasi matematis siswa SMP dalam memecahkan masalah matematika kontekstual. Skripsi (Tidak Dipublikasikan). Yogyakarta: Universitas Sanata Dharma.
Ati, R. (2019). Penerapan strategi pembelajaran konflik kognitif untuk menurunkan miskonsepsi siswa smp ditinjau dari self–efficacy. JURNAL SILOGISME : Kajian Ilmu Matematika Dan Pembelajarannya, 4(1), 7–13.
Blumenfeld, A., Velic, A., Bingman, E. K., Long, K. L., Aughenbaugh, W., Jung, S. A., & Liepert, A. E. (2020). A mastery learning module on sterile technique to prepare graduating medical students for internship. MedEdPORTAL : The Journal of Teaching and Learning Resources, 16(1), 1–5.
Carbonneau, K. J., Marley, S. C., & Selig, J. P. (2013). A meta-analysis of the efficacy of teaching mathematics with concrete manipulatives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 380-400.
Chung, M.–C., & Wang, C.–H. (2018). The effects of augmented reality representations on student’s’ understanding on learning fraction. Proceedings of the European Conference on E–Learning, ECEL, 2018–Novem, 715–720.
Darling–Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook–Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140.
Davis, K. (2019). Implementing the flex model of blended learning in a world history classroom: how blended learning affects student engagement and mastery. Theses and Dissertations.
Dewi, S. V. P., & Sopiany, H. N. (2017). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis siswa SMP kelas VII pada penerapan open-ended. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika (SESIOMADIKA) (pp. 680-688).
Dunn, W., Dong, Y., Zendejas, B., Ruparel, R., & Farley, D. (2017). Simulation, mastery learning and healthcare. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 353(2), 158–165.
Emery, A., Sanders, M., Anderman, L. H., & Yu, S. L. (2018). When mastery goals meet mastery learning: Administrator, teacher, and student perceptions. Journal of Experimental Education, 86(3), 419–441.
Faisal, F., & Martin, S. N. (2019). Science education in Indonesia: Past, present, and future. Asia–Pacific Science Education, 5(1), 1–29.
Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E., & Rugarcia, A. (2000). The future of engineering education: Part 2. Teaching methods that work. Chemical engineering education, 34(1), 26-39.
Fitri, S. (2018). Identifikasi miskonsepsi matematika siswa pada materi operasi aljabar (identification of student mathematics misconception in aljabar operating materials). Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Terapan, January 2018, 69–76.
Fitriani, D. A., Mardiyana, & Pramesti, G. (2017). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada pembelajaran matematika materi pokok ruang dimensi tiga ditinjau dari kecerdasan visual–spasial siswa kelas X SMA negeri 1 Klaten tahun ajaran 2012/2013. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika DanMatematika , 1(6), 27–34.
Fitrianna, A. Y., Dinia, S., & Nurhafifah, A. Y. (2018). Mathematical representation ability of senior high school students: An evaluation from students’ mathematical disposition. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 3(1), 46–56.
Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., & Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics : Response to intervention ( RTL ) for elementary and middle schools. Institute of Education Sciences.
Guan, D., Ai, J., Gao, Y., Li, H., Huang, B., & Si, J. (2021). Non–symbolic representation is modulated by math anxiety and cognitive inhibition while symbolic representation not. Psychological Research, 85(4), 1662–1672.
Gulo, A. R. (2019). Pengembangan dan penggunaan video pembelajaran untuk mengurangi miskonsepsi dan meningkatkan pemahaman siswa kelas XI IPA SMA BP Yogyakarta tentang hukum archimedes. Skripsi Universitas Sanata Dharma Yogyakarta.
Guskey, T. (2014). Synthesis of research on the effects of mastery learning in elementary and secondary classrooms. Journal of the Department of Supervision and Curriculum Development, 43(8), 73–80.
Harahap, F., Darussyamsu, R., Yuniarti, E., & Ristiono, R. (2019). Identification of misconceptions on material of food digestive system in humans using two tier multiple choice diagnostic tests at SMPN 15 Padang. Atrium Pendidikan Biologi, 4(1), 84–94.
Hatisaru, V. (2020). Exploring evidence of mathematical tasks and representations in the drawings of middle school students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), 1-21.
Hayat, B. (2018). The effect of mastery learning on affective characteristics of students a quantitative research synthesis. Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment, 1(1), 45–53.
Hendriana, H., Sumarmo, U., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2013). Kemampuan komunikasi matematik serta kemampuan dan disposisi berpikir kritis matematis. Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 35–45.
Herlina, E. (2013). Meningkatkan disposisi berpikir kreatif matematis melalui pendekatan apos. Infinity Journal, 2(2), 169–182.
Highley, T., & Edlin, A. E. (2009, October). Discrete mathematics assessment using learning objectives based on Bloom's taxonomy. In 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Husna, A. (2015). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis siswa dalam menyelesaiakan soal kontes literasi matematika (KLM) pada kelas IX SMPN 6 Banda Aceh tahun ajaran 2014/2015. Skripsi: Universitas Syiah Kuala
Imaduddin, M., & Haryani, S. (2019). The transition of pre–service chemistry teachers’ concept mastery about solutions in multiple representations–based learning. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 9(3), 203–218.
Irawan, E., Riyadi, R., & Triyanto, T. (2012). Analisis miskonsepsi mahasiswa STKIP PGRI Pacitan pada mata kuliah pengantar dasar matematika pokok bahasan logika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif mahasiswa. Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 1–18.
Ke, F., & M. Clark, K. (2020). Game–based multimodal representations and mathematical problem solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 103–122.
Khaerunnisa, E., Santosa, C. A. H. F., & Novaliyosi, N. (2020). Model pembelajaran concrete representational abstract (CRA) terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep calon guru matematika. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif–Inovatif, 11(2), 118–125.
Kholiqowati, H., Sugiarto, S., & Hidayah, I. (2016). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis ditinjau dari karakteristik cara berpikir peserta didik dalam pembelajaran dengan pendekatan saintifik. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 5(3), 234-242.
Komala, E., & Sarmini, S. (2020). Kemampuan representasi simbolik matematik siswa smp menggunakan blended learning. Prisma, 9(2), 204–212.
Kuswanti, Y., Setiawani, S., & Lestari, N. D. S. (2017). Analisis soal dalam buku siswa matematika kurikulum 2013 untuk sekolah menengah pertama kelas VII berdasarkan dimensi kognitif trends international mathematics and science study (TIMSS). Jurnal Edukasi, 4(3), 25–29.
Lengkana, A. S., Rahman, A. A., Alif, M. N., Mulya, G., Priana, A., & Hermawan, D. B. (2020). Static and dynamic balance learning in primary school students. International Journal of Human Movement and Sports Sciences, 8(6), 469-476.
Lee, S., Ke, F., & Ryu, J. (2020). Engagement and effectiveness of symbolic and iconic learning support for math problem representation: an eye tracking study. Interactive Learning Environments, 0(0), 1–18.
Lin, H. T., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. M. (2008). An implementation of web-based mastery learning system. International Journal of Instructional Media, 35(2), 209-221.
Maghfiroh, S., & Rohayati, A. (2020). Analisis kemampuan representasi matematis siswa SMP pada materi segiempat. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Karya Ilmiah, 10(1), 64–79.
Mainali, B. (2021). Representation in teaching and learning mathematics. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(1), 1-21.
Mangelep, N. O., & Kaunang, D. F. (2018). Pengembangan soal matematika realistik berdasarkan kerangka teori program for international students assesment. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 455–466.
Miatun, A., & Khusna, H. (2020). kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis berdasarkan disposisi matematis. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 269–278.
Munawaroh. (2017). The influence of teaching methods and learning environment to the student’s learning achievement of craft and entrepreneurship subjects at vocational high school. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(4), 665–678.
Nursyam, A. (2019). Peningkatan minat belajar siswa melalui media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi informasi. Ekspose: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan, 18(1), 811-819.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD publishing.
Pedersen, M. K., Bach, C. C., Gregersen, R. M., Højsted, I. H., & Jankvist, U. T. (2021). Mathematical representation competency in relation to use of digital technology and task design—a literature review. Mathematics, 9(4), 1–25.
Pujayanto, P., Budiharti, R., Radiyono, Y., Rizky, N., Nuraini, A., Putri, H. V., Saputro, D. E., & Adhitama, E. (2018). Pengembangan tes diagnostik miskonsepsi empat tahap tentang kinematika. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(2), 237–249.
Rahlan, I., & Sofyan, D. (2021). Kemampuan representasi dan disposisi matematis siswa melalui CTL dan SAVI. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(3), 493–504.
Ramadhan, M., Sunardi, S., & Kurniati, D. (2017). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika berstandar PISA dengan menggunakan certainty of response index (CRI). Kadikma, 8(1), 145–153.
Rizky, E. N. F., & Sritresna, T. (2021). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan disposisi matematis siswa antara guided inquiry dan problem posing. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 33-46.
Rohana, R., & Ningsih, Y. L. (2020). Students’ statistical reasoning in statistics method course, online submission. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 14(1), 81–90.
Royana, I., Afgani, M. W., & Wardani, A. K. (2020). Representasi simbolik siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal hots materi relasi dan fungsi kelas VIII SMP. Lentera Sriwijaya: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 22–34.
Sajadi, S. A., & Khaghanizadeh, M. (2016). Effectiveness and challenges of mastery learning in nursing education: A systematic review. International Journal of Medical Reviews, 2(4), 309–316.
Sarifah, F. S. D., Nuraidah, S., Riajanto, M. L. E. J., & Maya, R. (2018). Analisis pengaruh disposisi matematis terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMP. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif Volume, 1(2), 219–228.
Savitri, M. E., & Subanti, S. (2016). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada materi pecahan dalam bentuk aljabar ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa kelas VIII di SMP negeri 2 Adimulyo kabupaten Kebumen tahun ajaran 2013/2014. Jurnal Elektronik Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(4), 401–413.
Scholkopf, B., Locatello, F., Bauer, S., Ke, N. R., Kalchbrenner, N., Goyal, A., & Bengio, Y. (2021). Toward causal representation learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(5), 612–634.
Shafie, N., Shahdan, T. N. T., & Liew, M. S. (2010). Mastery learning assessment model (MLAM) in teaching and learning mathematics. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(3), 294–298.
Sopiany, H. N., & Rahayu, W. (2019). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa ditinjau dari teori kontruktivisme pada materi segiempat. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 185–200.
Sterner, G., Wolff, U., & Helenius, O. (2020). Reasoning about representations: effects of an early math intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(5), 782–800.
Sumarmo, U., Hidayat, W., Zukarnaen, R., Hamidah, H., & Sariningsih, R. (2012). Kemampuan dan disposisi berpikir logis, kritis, dan kreatif matematik. Jurnal Pengajaran MIPA, 17(1), 17–33.
Sumarmo, U. (2010). Berpikir dan disposisi matematik: Apa, mengapa, dan bagaimana dikembangkan pada peserta didik. Bandung: FPMIPA UPI.
Susilaningsih, E., Drastisianti, A., Lastri, Kusumo, E., & Alighiri, D. (2019). The analysis of concept mastery using redox teaching materials with multiple representation and contextual teaching learning approach. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(4), 475–481.
Susilo, B. E., Darhim, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2019). Students critical thinking skills toward concepts differences in finding area of a plane region and definite integral. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 8(1), 1-7.
Suwarto, S. (2010). Dimensi pengetahuan dan dimensi proses kognitif dalam pendidikan. Widyatama, 19(1), 76–91.
Tes, P., Three, D., Multiple, T., Mengidentifikasi, U., Peserta, M., & Kelas, D. (2016). Pengembangan tes diagnostik three tier multiple choice untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi peserta didik kelas XI. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 5(2), 101–110.
Tremblay, K. (2013). OECD assessment of higher education learning outcomes (ahelo): Rationale, challenges and initial insights from the feasibility study. Modeling and Measuring Competencies in Higher Education: Tasks and Challenges, 1, 113–126.
Wang, Y., Xu, Y., Tabari, H., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Song, S., & Hu, Z. (2020). Innovative trend analysis of annual and seasonal rainfall in the Yangtze River Delta, eastern China. Atmospheric Research, 231, 1–26.
Wijaya, L. T. T., Jamaluddin, J., & Hadiprayitno, G. (2020). Penguasaan konsep sains peserta didik SMP berdasarkan dimensi proses kognitif dan dimensi dengetahuan. Jurnal Pijar Mipa, 15(4), 357–361.
Yeh, C. Y. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chen, Z. H., Liao, C. C. Y., & Chan, T. W. (2019). Enhancing achievement and interest in mathematics learning through Math–Island. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 14(1), 1–19.
Yeh, V. J. H., Sherwood, G., Durham, C. F., Kardong–Edgren, S., Schwartz, T. A., & Beeber, L. S. (2019). Online simulation–based mastery learning with deliberate practice: Developing interprofessional communication skill. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 32(1), 27–38.
Yudkowsky, R., Park, Y. S., Lineberry, M., Knox, A., & Ritter, E. M. (2015). Setting mastery learning standards. Academic Medicine, 90(11), 1495–1500.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
