Investigating students’ conceptual change in learning newton’s laws through a project-based learning design informed by understanding by design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v5i2.801Keywords:
Conceptual Change, Misconception, Newton’s Laws, Project-Based Learning, Understanding by DesignAbstract
Background: Misconceptions related to force and Newton’s Laws continue to be widely observed in secondary physics classrooms, often emerging from students’ everyday reasoning and instructional approaches that prioritize formula application over conceptual understanding.
Aim: This study seeks to examine how a Project-Based Learning design informed by the Understanding by Design framework supports students’ conceptual change in learning Newton’s Laws.
Method: The study employed a mixed-methods experimental design involving Grade XI high school students. Students’ conceptions were identified using a four-tier diagnostic test administered before and after instruction, complemented by questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Quantitative analysis focused on conceptual change categories and N-change values, while qualitative data were used to explore students’ reasoning processes during learning activities.
Results: The results show that students initially demonstrated a high prevalence of misconceptions, particularly in relation to Newton’s Third Law. Following the learning intervention, several students exhibited shifts toward scientifically accepted conceptions. Nevertheless, the overall magnitude of conceptual change remained low, indicating that while improvement occurred, it was not evenly distributed across students.
Conclusion: The findings suggest that a PjBL approach guided by the UbD framework can facilitate conceptual change in learning Newton’s Laws, especially in addressing persistent misconceptions. However, the limited level of change highlights the need for more refined instructional designs, longer learning durations, and the integration of isomorphic diagnostic assessments to achieve stronger and more consistent conceptual development.
References
Abuhassna, H., Adnan, M. A. B. M., & Awae, F. (2024). Exploring the synergy between instructional design models and learning theories: A systematic literature review. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(2), ep499. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14289
Ahshan, R. (2021). A Framework of Implementing Strategies for Active Student Engagement in Remote/Online Teaching and Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(9), 483. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090483
Batlolona, J. R., & Jamaludin, J. (2024). Students’ misconceptions on the concept of sound: A case study about Marinyo, Tanimbar Islands. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(3), 681–689. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i3.21135
Beneroso, D., & Robinson, J. (2022). Online project-based learning in engineering design: Supporting the acquisition of design skills. Education for Chemical Engineers, 38, 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.09.002
Bielik, V., Nosáľ, V., Nechalová, L., Špánik, M., Žilková, K., & Grendar, M. (2025). The prediction model of academic achievement based on cardiorespiratory fitness and BMI status for ninth-grade students. BMC Pediatrics, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-024-05353-2
Craig, S. L., Smith, S. J., & Frey, B. B. (2022). Professional development with universal design for learning: Supporting teachers as learners to increase the implementation of UDL. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1685563
Crompton, H., & Sykora, C. (2021). Developing instructional technology standards for educators: A design-based research study. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100044
Dellantonio, S., & Pastore, L. (2021). Ignorance, misconceptions and critical thinking. Synthese, 198(8), 7473–7501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02529-7
DiLisi, G. A. (2025). Simplified Classical Mechanics, Volume 1 (Second Edition): Foundations of motion. Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-6397-6
Ding, Y., Zhu, G., Bian, Q., & Bao, L. (2024). Analysis of students’ conceptual change in learning Newton’s third law with an integrated framework of model analysis and knowledge integration. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 20(2), 020141. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.20.020141
Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: Perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1), 1920090. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090
Ferrarelli, P., & Iocchi, L. (2021). Learning Newtonian Physics through Programming Robot Experiments. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 789–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09508-3
Fries, L., Son, J. Y., Givvin, K. B., & Stigler, J. W. (2021). Practicing Connections: A Framework to Guide Instructional Design for Developing Understanding in Complex Domains. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 739–762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09561-x
Garcia-Guarin, J. (2025). Transformation of Trigonometric Functions into Hyperbolic Functions Based on Cable Statics. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 15(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052647
Guerra-Reyes, F., Guerra-Dávila, E., Naranjo-Toro, M., Basantes-Andrade, A., & Guevara-Betancourt, S. (2024). Misconceptions in the Learning of Natural Sciences: A Systematic Review. Education Sciences, 14(5), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050497
Khishfe, R. (2023). Improving Students’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Review of the Literature. Science & Education, 32(6), 1887–1931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-022-00390-8
Kozinets, R. V. (2022). Immersive netnography: A novel method for service experience research in virtual reality, augmented reality and metaverse contexts. Journal of Service Management, 34(1), 100–125. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-12-2021-0481
Li, X., Li, Y., & Wang, W. (2023). Long-Lasting Conceptual Change in Science Education. Science & Education, 32(1), 123–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00288-x
Liu, C., Hou, J., Tu, Y.-F., Wang, Y., & Hwang, G.-J. (2023). Incorporating a reflective thinking promoting mechanism into artificial intelligence-supported English writing environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(9), 5614–5632. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.2012812
Liu, C.-S., Tsai, C.-C., & Chang, C.-W. (2025). Linearly Perturbed Frequency Equation, New Frequency Formula, and a Linearized Galerkin Method for Nonlinear Vibrational Oscillators. Vibration, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/vibration8020016
Lorenz, G. (2021). Subtle discrimination: Do stereotypes among teachers trigger bias in their expectations and widen ethnic achievement gaps? Social Psychology of Education, 24(2), 537–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09615-0
Manso, R., & Cabo, C. (2025). An algorithm for robust tree detection in ground-based point clouds based on classical mechanics. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2024.109750
Markula, A., & Aksela, M. (2022). The key characteristics of project-based learning: How teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x
May, J. M. (2023). Historical analysis of innovation and research in physics instructional laboratories: Recurring themes and future directions. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(2), 020168. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.020168
Messer, M., Brown, N. C. C., Kölling, M., & Shi, M. (2024). Automated Grading and Feedback Tools for Programming Education: A Systematic Review. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ., 24(1), 10:1-10:43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3636515
Mohamad, S. K., & Tasir, Z. (2023). Exploring how feedback through questioning may influence reflective thinking skills based on association rules mining technique. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47, 101231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101231
Nyiembui, P., Zambo, M. N., Nana, B., & Woafo, P. (2025). Nonlinear Dynamics of an Oscillating Electromechanical System Based on Coil Gun Principle: Theory and Experiment. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 35(7). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127425500816
Pisano, R., & Bussotti, P. (2022). Conceptual Frameworks on the Relationship Between Physics–Mathematics in the Newton Principia Geneva Edition (1822). Foundations of Science, 27(3), 1127–1182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-021-09820-2
Reiser, B. J., Novak, M., McGill, T. A. W., & Penuel, W. R. (2021). Storyline Units: An Instructional Model to Support Coherence from the Students’ Perspective. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(7), 805–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1884784
Ren, R., Chen, W., & Zhao, S. (2025). The indirect effects of school bullying on mathematics achievement: The mediating roles of teacher-student relationships, sense of belonging and differences between genders. BMC Public Health, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-21307-4
Resbiantoro, G., Setiani, R., & Dwikoranto. (2022). A Review of Misconception in Physics: The Diagnosis, Causes, and Remediation. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 19(2), 403–427.
Sajja, R., Sermet, Y., Cwiertny, D., & Demir, I. (2025). Integrating AI and Learning Analytics for Data-Driven Pedagogical Decisions and Personalized Interventions in Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09897-9
Schussnig, R., Fehn, N., Munch, P., & Kronbichler, M. (2025). Matrix-free higher-order finite element methods for hyperelasticity. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2024.117600
Scully, D., Lehane, P., & Scully, C. (2021). ‘It is no longer scary’: Digital learning before and during the Covid-19 pandemic in Irish secondary schools. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(1), 159–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2020.1854844
Sorensen, G., Dennerlein, J. T., Peters, S. E., Sabbath, E. L., Kelly, E. L., & Wagner, G. R. (2021). The future of research on work, safety, health and wellbeing: A guiding conceptual framework. Social Science & Medicine, 269, 113593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113593
Utami, V. B., Wilujeng, I., & Rahmawati, L. (2025). Effectiveness of STEM-Based Project Instructional Materials on Newton’s Laws in Improving Scientific Literacy. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 3139(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3139/1/012101
Zhao, L., Zhao, B., & Li, C. (2023). Alignment analysis of teaching–learning-assessment within the classroom: How teachers implement project-based learning under the curriculum standards. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-023-00078-1
Zhao, L.-C., Zhang, Y., Xu, L., & El Ouni, M. H. (2025). Effect of piecewise nanocomposite characteristics on nonlinear thermal buckling of GPL-reinforced joined conical shells. Engineering Structures, 342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120829
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jovi Yuzzer Budiman, Achmad Samsudin, Ahmad Aminudin

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
