Teachers’ knowledge of subject matter in formal definition of limit at senior high school level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v5i2.769Keywords:
Pedagogical Content Knowledge, Limit of Functions, Mathematics Instruction, Novice and Experienced Teachers, Secondary Education.Abstract
Background: Vocational schools in border areas face systemic challenges such as limited infrastructure and poor curriculum-context alignment, hindering effective mathematics instruction and student engagement.
Aims: This study investigates how mathematics learning is organized and implemented in a vocational high school situated in the Entikong border area of West Borneo, Indonesia. The research seeks to identify instructional patterns, contextual challenges, and adaptive strategies used by educators under constrained conditions.
Method: Using a qualitative case study design, data were gathered through direct classroom observation, semi-structured interviews with teachers and school leaders, and review of official teaching documents. Thematic analysis and data triangulation were employed to ensure rigor and credibility.
Results: The analysis highlights a continued reliance on teacher-centered instruction, minimal use of contextual or vocationally integrated methods, and limited student engagement. Assessment practices predominantly measure cognitive outcomes, lacking elements that support student reflection or vocational competencies. Curriculum delivery is often disrupted by time limitations and infrastructural shortfalls.
Conclusion: Improving mathematics instruction in border-based vocational schools necessitates flexible teaching models tailored to the local context. Strengthening professional development, embedding authentic assessments, and enhancing school-community collaboration are crucial steps toward addressing educational disparities in underserved regions.References
Aba-Oli, Z., Koyas, K., & Husen, A. (2025). Higher-order thinking skills-oriented problem-based learning interventions in mathematics: A systematic literature review. School Science and Mathematics, 125(3), 214–231. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12676
Agathangelou, S. A., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2021). Is content knowledge pre-requisite of pedagogical content knowledge? An empirical investigation. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(5), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-020-09466-0
Alemany-Arrebola, I., Ortiz-Gómez, M. D. M., Lizarte-Simón, E. J., & Mingorance-Estrada, Á. C. (2025). The attitudes towards mathematics: Analysis in a multicultural context. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04548-x
Al-khresheh, M. H. (2024). Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100218
Bagiyan, A. Y., Shiryaeva, T. A., Tikhonova, E. V., & Mekeko, N. M. (2021). The real value of words: How target language linguistic modelling of foreign language teaching content shapes students’ professional identity. Heliyon, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06581
Beck, J. S., & Nunnaley, D. (2021). A continuum of data literacy for teaching. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69, 100871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100871
Bragg, L. A., Walsh, C., & Heyeres, M. (2021). Successful design and delivery of online professional development for teachers: A systematic review of the literature. Computers & Education, 166, 104158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104158
Búrigo, E. Z. (2025). From oral counting to plotting graphs: Advances in girls’ math education in the South of Brazil. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 78. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2025.101239
Chan, K. K. H. (2022). A critical review of studies using the pedagogical content knowledge map approach. International Journal of Science Education, 44(3), 487–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2035011
Chew, S. L., & and Cerbin, W. J. (2021). The cognitive challenges of effective teaching. The Journal of Economic Education, 52(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2020.1845266
Diaz Lema, M. L., Masci, C., Soncin, M., & Agasisti, T. (2025). Risky decline? Exploring the determinants of pupil’s proficiency development over time. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 99. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102207
Eidin, E., & Shwartz, Y. (2023). From Ideal to Practical—A Design of Teacher Professional Development on Socioscientific Issues. Sustainability, 15(14), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411394
Ekmekci, A., & Serrano, D. M. (2022). The Impact of Teacher Quality on Student Motivation, Achievement, and Persistence in Science and Mathematics. Education Sciences, 12(10), Article 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100649
González-Pérez, M., Sánchez-Oliva, D., Martín-Acosta, F., Ruiz-Hermosa, A., Camiletti-Moirón, D., & Grao-Cruces, A. (2025). A mixed-methods approach of the effect of physically active learning on time-on-task in the secondary education class: The ACTIVE CLASS study. Learning and Instruction, 97. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2025.102091
Handulle, A., & and Vassenden, A. (2021). ‘The art of kindergarten drop off’: How young Norwegian-Somali parents perform ethnicity to avoid reports to Child Welfare Services. European Journal of Social Work, 24(3), 469–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2020.1713053
Hanna, A. (2021). Silence at school: Uses and experiences of silence in pedagogy at a secondary school. British Educational Research Journal, 47(5), 1158–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3719
Ho, D. G. E., Sa’adi, M., He, D., & Hoon, C.-Y. (2023). Silence over the wire: Student verbal participation and the virtual classroom in the digital era. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(4), 599–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09834-4
Huang, W., Looi, C.-K., & Kim, M. (2025). A clash of epistemic tools: Computer programming and paper-and-pencil in secondary school mathematics problem solving. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(5), 1259–1282. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10512-z
Hui, J., Zhou, Y., Oubibi, M., Di, W., Zhang, L., & Zhang, S. (2022). Research on Art Teaching Practice Supported by Virtual Reality (VR) Technology in the Primary Schools. Sustainability, 14(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031246
Jaeger, E. (2021). Friends and authors: Spontaneous co-composing in a writing workshop. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 21(2), 177–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468798419833096
Jederud, S., Rytzler, J. & and Lindqvist, P. (2022). Learning to teach as a two-sided endeavor: Mentors’ perceptions of paired practicum in initial teacher education. Teaching Education, 33(4), 454–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2021.1978967
Kim, J., Lee, H., & Cho, Y. H. (2022). Learning design to support student-AI collaboration: Perspectives of leading teachers for AI in education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(5), 6069–6104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10831-6
Lei, M., & Medwell, J. (2021). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on student teachers: How the shift to online collaborative learning affects student teachers’ learning and future teaching in a Chinese context. Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09686-w
Li, Q., Li, Z., & Han, J. (2021). A hybrid learning pedagogy for surmounting the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic in the performing arts education. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7635–7655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10612-1
Llinares, S. (2021). Instructional quality of mathematics teaching and mathematics teacher education. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 24(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09488-2
McPhail, G. (2021). The search for deep learning: A curriculum coherence model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 53(4), 420–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1748231
Moulds, S. (2021). Visible learning at law school: An Australian approach to improving teacher impact in intensive and online courses. The Law Teacher, 55(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069400.2020.1733358
Pellas, N., Mystakidis, S., & Kazanidis, I. (2021). Immersive Virtual Reality in K-12 and Higher Education: A systematic review of the last decade scientific literature. Virtual Reality, 25(3), 835–861. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-020-00489-9
Prather, J., Reeves, B. N., Denny, P., Becker, B. A., Leinonen, J., Luxton-Reilly, A., Powell, G., Finnie-Ansley, J., & Santos, E. A. (2023). “It’s Weird That it Knows What I Want”: Usability and Interactions with Copilot for Novice Programmers. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 31(1), 4:1-4:31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3617367
Rich, P. J., Mason, S. L., & O’Leary, J. (2021). Measuring the effect of continuous professional development on elementary teachers’ self-efficacy to teach coding and computational thinking. Computers & Education, 168, 104196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104196
Santos, J. M., & Castro, R. D. R. (2021). Technological Pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) in action: Application of learning in the classroom by pre-service teachers (PST). Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100110
Shvartsberg, Y. (2025). A comparative study of the Brearley School and Wadleigh High School in early 20th century New York City. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 78. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2025.101237
Susada, B. L. (2025). A structural model of college students’ mathematics performance: The role of psychological, physiological, and psychosocial factors. Palawan Scientist, 17(1), 10–19. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.69721/TPS.J.2025.17.1.02
Tong, T., Pi, F., Zheng, S., Zhong, Y., Lin, X., & Wei, Y. (2025). Exploring the Effect of Mathematics Skills on Student Performance in Physics Problem-Solving: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Research in Science Education, 55(3), 489–509. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-024-10201-5
Wang, Y. (2025). Becoming a co-designer: The change in participants’ perceived self-efficacy during a co-design process. CoDesign, 21(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2024.2362327
Wild, G. (2023). Misunderstanding Flight Part 2: Epistemology and the Philosophy of Science. Education Sciences, 13(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13080836
Zhao, B., Lucas, C. G., & Bramley, N. R. (2024). A model of conceptual bootstrapping in human cognition. Nature Human Behaviour, 8(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01719-1
Zhao, Y., Song, J., Liu, M., Zhao, Y., Olympios, A. V., Sapin, P., Yan, J., & Markides, C. N. (2022). Thermo-economic assessments of pumped-thermal electricity storage systems employing sensible heat storage materials. Renewable Energy, 186, 431–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.01.017
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
