Advancing mathematical representation abilities through scientifically-oriented contextual learning modules in junior secondary education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v5i1.763Keywords:
ADDIE Model, Contextual Learning, Mathematical Representation, Scientific Approach.Abstract
Background: Many students face difficulties in expressing mathematical ideas due to the absence of instructional materials that connect lessons with real-world contexts. Applying a contextual approach aligned with scientific inquiry may improve students’ conceptual understanding and engagement.
Aims: This research seeks to develop and assess the effectiveness of contextual teaching modules designed using a scientific framework to strengthen the mathematical representation skills of junior secondary learners.
Methods: Adopting the ADDIE instructional design model, this study utilized a Research and Development (R&D) methodology involving 87 seventh-grade students from two Indonesian schools. Data collection included expert validation instruments, learner feedback surveys, and pretest-posttest measurements, with analysis based on validity, practicality, and effect size metrics.
Results: Expert evaluations confirmed high validity, with average ratings of 3.71 for content and 3.73 for media. Student feedback indicated high engagement across both trial groups (mean scores above 3.3). Effect size analysis showed substantial learning gains, with Cohen’s d values of 0.82 and 0.96, indicating strong impact on students’ mathematical representation ability.
Conclusion: The contextual modules developed through this study, when implemented with a scientific approach, were validated as effective tools for improving students’ ability to represent mathematical concepts. These outcomes underscore the value of integrating contextual and inquiry-driven strategies into teaching practices to make abstract content more accessible and meaningful in mathematics education.
References
Abd Rahman, S. N. S., Abdullah, A. H., & Ibrahim, N. H. (2024, August). Does geogebra-assisted contextual learning strategy enhance form one students’ higher order thinking skills (HOTS)?. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 3189(1). AIP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0224377
Ahmed, Y., Taha, M. H., & Khayal, S. (2024). Integrating research and teaching in medical education: challenges, strategies, and implications for healthcare. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 12(1), 1–7.
Akuma, F. V., & Gaigher, E. (2021). A Systematic review describing contextual teaching challenges associated with inquiry-based practical work in natural sciences education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12), em2044. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11352
Al Mamun, M. A., & Lawrie, G. (2023). Student-content interactions: Exploring behavioural engagement with self-regulated inquiry-based online learning modules. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00221-x
Alam, A., & and Mohanty, A. (2023). Implications of virtual reality (VR) for school teachers and instructional designers: An empirical investigation. Cogent Education, 10(2), 2260676. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2260676
Bakker, A., Cai, J., & Zenger, L. (2021). Future themes of mathematics education research: An international survey before and during the pandemic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10049-w
Barthakur, A., Joksimovic, S., Kovanovic, V., Richey, M., & Pardo, A. (2022). Aligning objectives with assessment in online courses: Integrating learning analytics and measurement theory. Computers & Education, 190, 104603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104603
Darling-Hammond, L., Schachner, Abby C. W., Wojcikiewicz, Steven K., & and Flook, L. (2024). Educating teachers to enact the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2022.2130506
de Andrade, M. O., Zurita, M., Burova, I., & Nyamapfene, A. (2022, March). Assessing higher levels of learning through real-life problems in engineering mathematics. In 2022 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON) (pp. 2002-2006). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON52537.2022.9766484
Dilla, N., & Turpin, M. (2021). Teaching problem solving to undergraduate STEM students: A systematic literature review. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 1518, 72–
Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92858-2_5
Ernesto, J. V., Machado, D. S., & Lellis-Santos, C. (2022). The presidential election of the human body: Applying contextual learning to promote connections between the student and the curricular content. Advances in Physiology Education, 46(2), 228–232. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00212.2020
Fantinelli, S., Cortini, M., Di Fiore, T., Iervese, S., & Galanti, T. (2024). Bridging the gap between theoretical learning and practical application: A qualitative study in the italian educational context. Education Sciences, 14(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14020198
Firmansyah, Mujib, A., Siregar, R. N., & Mathelinea, D. (2025). Electronic modul contextual learning in mathematics: Analizing its impact on student self-efficacy and problem-solving abilities. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(2), 495–512. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i2.42554
Haigler, K. (2021). The role of occupational research in complex assessments: Aligning educational practices with workplace requirements. Journal of Writing Analytics, 5, 259–291. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.37514/JWA-J.2021.5.1.08
Hasanah, U., Djulaeka, D., Zaman, N., Rusdiana, E., & Driss, B. (2025). The indonesian consumer protection law for credit union depositors in credit union failures: Quo vadis?. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 8(1), 108–133. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v8i1.12415
Hurrell, D. (2021). Conceptual knowledge or procedural knowledge or conceptual knowledge and procedural knowledge: Why the conjunction is important to teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 46(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2021v46n2.4
Hwang, G.-J., & and Chang, C.-Y. (2023). Facilitating decision-making performances in nursing treatments: A contextual digital game-based flipped learning approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(1), 156–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1765391
Indrapangastuti, D., Surjono, H. D., Sugiman, & Yanto, B. E. (2021). Effectiveness of the blended learning model to improve student achievement of mathematical concepts. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(4), 423–430. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2021.84.423.430
Ismail, F. H., Muzana, Z., Hamat, Z., & Sulong, J. (2024). Customary and islamic practices in inheritance distribution: Insights from The Gampong Customary Court in Pidie. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i2.1544
Johar, R., Harnita, F., Sasaki, D., & Oktari, R. S. (2025). Incorporating disaster context into mathematical problem-solving abilities: The role of cognitive and affective needs. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 116. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.105083
Kritt, D., & Budwig, N. (2022). The future of constructivist education. Human Development, 66(4–5), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1159/000526275
Le, H. V., & Nguyen, L. Q. (2024). Promoting L2 learners’ critical thinking skills: The role of social
constructivism in reading class. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1241973
Li, H., Majumdar, R., Chen, M.-R. A., & Ogata, H. (2021). Goal-oriented active learning (GOAL) system to promote reading engagement, self-directed learning behavior, and motivation in extensive reading. Computers & Education, 171, 104239.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104239
Mahmuti, A., Hamzić, D. K., & Thaqi, X. (2025). The impact of contextual teaching and learning on improving student achievement in economic mathematics. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 20(3). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/16233
Moon, J., Webster, C. A., Stodden, D. F., Brian, A., Mulvey, K. L., Beets, M., Egan, C. A., McIntosh, L. I. F., Merica, C. B., & Russ, L. (2024). Systematic review and meta-analysis of physical activity interventions to increase elementary children’s motor competence: A comprehensive school physical activity program perspective. BMC Public Health, 24(1), 826. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18145-1
Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. (2021). The use of multiple representations in undergraduate physics education: What do we know and where do we go from here?. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), em1934. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577
Nariman, N. (2021). How does an industry-aligned technology-rich problem-based learning (PBL) model influence low-income and native hawaiian student’s STEM career interest?. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 9(1 Special Issue), 150–178. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.jpblhe.v9i1.6367
Otis, E., Ishartono, N., Rafii, M., Meidina, R., Amiliana, N., Razak, R. B. A., & Halili, S. H. B. (2025). Exploring of geometry concepts in Sambisari Temple. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 3142(1),
p. 020043). AIP Publishing LLC. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0262008
Pathoni, H., Ashyar, R., Maison, & Huda, N. (2022). Measuring lecturer’s perception in stem approach based contextual learning implementation. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 132–146. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.1297
Pathuddin, H., Kamariah, & Mariani, A. (2023). Ethnomathematics of pananrang: A guidance of traditional farming system of the Buginese community. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 205–224. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.pp205-224
Petraki, E., & and Khat, K. (2022). Challenges and constraints in the design of an ESP course in Cambodia: Implications for higher education institutions. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 260–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2020.1798738
Pramulia, P., Yustitia, V., Kusmaharti, D., Fanny, A. M., & Oktavia, I. A. (2025). Ethnomathematics of Al Akbar Mosque Surabaya: Augmented reality comics to improve elementary school students’ literacy and numeracy. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 7(6). Scopus. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2025277
Rachmadina, D., & Pratiwi, D. D. (2021, February). Developing mathematics video assisted by powtoon application in contextual learning approach. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1796, No. 1, p. 012027). IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742- 6596/1796/1/012027
Saracho, O. N. (2023). Theories of child development and their impact on early childhood education and care. Early Childhood Education Journal, 51(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643- 021-01271-5
Slamet, F. A. (2022). Model penelitian pengembangan (RnD) (R. Risdiantoro (ed.)). Institut Agama Islam Sunan Kalijogo Malang.
Sugiyono, P. (2011). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Alpabeta, Bandung, 62, 70. Spooner, K. (2024). Using mathematical modelling to provide students with a contextual learning experience of differential equations. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science
and Technology, 55(2), 565–573. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2023.2244472 Stieff, M., & DeSutter, D. (2021). Sketching, not representational competence, predicts improved
science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(1), 128–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21650
Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Quoc, N. V. A. (2021). The improvement of 10th students’ mathematical communication skills through learning ellipse topics. Heliyon, 7(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08282
Ünal, Z. E., Ala, A. M., Kartal, G., Özel, S., & Geary, D. C. (2023). Visual and symbolic representations as components of algebraic reasoning. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 9(2), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.11151
Vinogradova, M., Malchukova, N., & Kulikova, S. (2024). Increasing motivation to study mathematics among future agricultural engineers. Relacoes Internacionais No Mundo Atual, 2(44), 95–105. Scopus.
Youhasan, P., Chen, Y., Lyndon, M., & Henning, M. A. (2021). Exploring the pedagogical design features of the flipped classroom in undergraduate nursing education: A systematic review. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00555-w
Ziatdinov, R., & Valles, J. R. (2022). Synthesis of modeling, visualization, and programming in geogebra as an effective approach for teaching and learning STEM Topics. Mathematics, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030398
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
