Enhancing conceptual understanding and learning skills: The role of strategy, motivation, teacher support, and self-efficacy

Authors

  • Ummiy Fauziyah Laili Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri
  • Syamsul Huda Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri
  • Atika Anggraini Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri
  • Fareza Chandri Maharani Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri
  • Luthfiyatul Muniroh University of Tsukuba
  • Rofiqul Umam University of Tsukuba http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7095-5967

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v5i1.653

Keywords:

Conceptual understanding, Learning skills, Learning strategy, Motivation, Self-efficacy, Teacher support.

Abstract

Background: Effective learning involves more than mere exposure to information; it requires learners to engage strategically, be motivated, and operate within supportive environments. In junior high school science education, students often face challenges in developing a deep conceptual understanding and acquiring scientific skills. Addressing this issue calls for the implementation of learning strategies that promote active engagement and student-centered learning.
Aim: This study aims to investigate the impact of the Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) learning strategy on students’ conceptual understanding and science learning skills. It also explores the role of learning motivation, teacher support, and self-efficacy in supporting students' learning processes.
Method: A quantitative research design was employed, utilizing the Partial Least Squares (PLS) analysis approach. The sample consisted of 40 junior high school students selected through a saturated sampling technique. Data were gathered through questionnaires, classroom observations, and documentation, and analyzed using SmartPLS software to assess the relationships among the studied variables.
Result: The results revealed that the RQA learning strategy significantly influences students’ conceptual understanding and science learning skills. While learning motivation, teacher support, and self-efficacy also have positive effects, the RQA strategy was identified as the most influential factor in enhancing science learning outcomes.
Conclusion: The findings underscore the importance of innovative and student-centered learning strategies, such as RQA, in improving science education at the junior high school level. These insights are valuable for educators and curriculum developers in designing more interactive and supportive learning environments that foster deeper understanding and scientific competence among students.

References

Aisya, N., Ibrohim, I., Mahanal, S., & Maghfiroh, H. (2023). The effect of reading questioning answering integrated with creative problem solving on critical thinking. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 9(2), 198–205. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i2.25718

Basar, Z. M., Mansor, A. N., Jamaludin, K. A., & Alias, B. S. (2021). The Effectiveness and Challenges of Online Learning for Secondary School Students - A Case Study. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(3), 119–129. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i3.14514

Cheah, J. H., Amaro, S., & Roldán, J. L. (2023). Multigroup analysis of more than two groups in PLS-SEM: A review, illustration, and recommendations. Journal of Business Research, 156(April 2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113539

Coletta, V. P. (2023). Evidence for a normal distribution of normalized gains. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(1), 10111. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010111

Coletta, V. P., & Steinert, J. J. (2020). Why normalized gain should continue to be used in analyzing preinstruction and postinstruction scores on concept inventories. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(1), 10108. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010108

Dewar, B. J., & Walker, E. (1999). Experiential learning: Issues for supervision. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 30(6), 1459–1467. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1999.01228.x

Diani, R., Herliantari, H., Irwandani, I., Saregar, A., & Umam, R. (2019). Search, Solve, Create, and Share (SSCS) Learning Model: The Impact on the Students’ Creative Problem-Solving Ability on the Concept of Substance Pressure. Jurnal Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 9(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpfa.v9n1.p65-77

Dimov, P. S. (2021). Online Tool for Misinformation Detection: Enchansing Media Literacy and Critical Thinking Skills. Online Learning in Educational Research, 4(2), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v4i2.413

Eloranta, V., Hakanen, E., & Shaw, C. (2024). Teaching for paradigm shifts: Supporting the drivers of radical creativity in management education. Educational Research Review, 45(September), 100641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100641

Eveland, V. B., Crutchfield, T. N., Tsang, R. C. W., & Sabol, M. A. (2024). Using PLS-SEM to test the relationship model of corporate social performance across the product/service continuum: When do shared values matter? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 79(April), 103873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103873

Fauzi, M. A. (2022). Partial least square structural equation modelling (PLSSEM) in knowledge management studies: Knowledge sharing in virtual communities. Knowledge Management and E-Learning, 14(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.34105/j.kmel.2022.14.007

Febrianti, W., Hendriansyah, E., Imani, K. A., Harielpaniadi, M. A., Sari, N. N., & Hartini, T. I. (2024). Understanding The Interaction Between Pressure and Volume in Gas Systems Through Boyle’s Law Practicum. Islamic Journal of Integrated Science Education, 3(3), 147–157. https://doi.org/10.30762/ijise.v3i3.3755

Gruber, H. (2024). New section “Discourses and Rejoinders” in the Journal Educational Research Review. Educational Research Review, 44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100626

Hair, J., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027

Hu, D., Chen, J., Li, Y., & Wang, M. (2025). Technology-enhanced content and language integrated learning: A systematic review of empirical studies. Educational Research Review, 47(February), 100677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100677

Huda, S., Anggraini, L., Saputri, R., Syazali, M., & Umam, R. (2019). Learning model to improve the ability to understand mathematical concepts. Prisma, 173(2), 173–181. https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/prisma

Huda, S., Muawanah, Munifah, Syazali, M., Palupi, E. K., Umam, R., & Tortop, H. S. (2020). Islamic education in supply chain system by prioritizing manners as a success factor of millennial generation on socializing. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 853–863.

License, I. (2024). Virtual Laboratories In Science Education : Unveiling Trajectories , Themes , and Emerging Paradigms (2013-2023). Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(5), 990–1009. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.990

Malik, F. A., Nurfauziah, R., Sofiah, S., Pratama, T., Nurhayati, T., Hartini, T. I., & Anghel, C. V. (2025). Effectiveness of Deep Learning Basic Physics 1 Using A Multi Representation Approach Based on Youtube Vidio with Infographic Results. Islamic Journal of Integrated Science Education, 4(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.30762/ijise.v4i1.4947

Munifah, M., Romadhona, A. N., Ridhona, I., Ramadhani, R., Umam, R., & Tortop, H. S. (2019). How to Manage Numerical Abilities in Algebra Material? Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v10i2.5325

Nguyen, T. (2015). The Effectiveness of Online Learning: Beyond No Significant Difference and Future Horizons. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 11(2), 309–319.

Noura, K. (2024). Preparing for the Future of Education : Adapting to the Technological Revolution and the World of Work. Smart Society: Community Service and Empowerment Journal, 4(2), 55–69. https://doi.org/10.58524/smartsociety.v4i2.617

Oje, A. V., Hunsu, N. J., & Fiorella, L. (2025). A systematic review of evidence-based design and pedagogical principles in educational virtual reality environments. Educational Research Review, 47(February), 100676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100676

Pedagogical, U. (2025). Enhancing Physics Education Through Virtual Laboratories : Recommendations for Teachers in Resource-Limited Settings. 2(3).

Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning Journal, 21(3), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i3.1225

Prastowo, R., Huda, S., Umam, R., Jermsittiparsert, K., Prasetiyo, A. E., Tortop, H. S., & Syazali, M. (2019). Academic Achievement and Conceptual Understanding of Electrodynamics: Applications Geoelectric Using Cooperative Learning Model. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 8(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v0i0.4614

Putri, A. D. G., Hayu, W. R. R., Ramdhani, M. R., & Muniroh, L. (2025). The Influence of Students’ Creativity on Science Learning Indepencence. Islamic Journal of Integrated Science Education, 4(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30762/ijise.v4i1.4746

Rauf, A., Fakhri, M. M., Fathahillah, F., Surianto, D. F., Baso, F., Arifiyanti, F., & Amukune, S. (2021). Harnessing Digital Skills for Academic Success: Unveiling The Power of Learning Motivation in Computational Thinking and tech Integration. Online Learning in Educational Research, 4(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.58524/oler.v4i2.501

Reyes, R. L., Isleta, K. P., Regala, J. D., & Bialba, D. M. R. (2024). Enhancing experiential science learning with virtual labs: A narrative account of merits, challenges, and implementation strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, August, 3167–3186. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.13061

Richter, N. F., & Tudoran, A. A. (2024). Elevating theoretical insight and predictive accuracy in business research: Combining PLS-SEM and selected machine learning algorithms. Journal of Business Research, 173. 114453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114453

Ridwanulloh, M. U., Huda, S., & Umam, R. (2022). Innovative Leadership Management: The Pattern of School Quality Development at SMP Muhammadiyah 2 Inovasi Malang. Progresiva : Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pendidikan Islam, 11(01), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.22219/progresiva.v11i01.20742

Rozikin, A., Suherman, S., Farida, F., & Tasca, R. (2021). Investigating the relationship between environmental literacy and mathematical literacy toward computer self-efficacy in secondary school. Journal of Advance Sciences and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v4i2.363

Sarstedt, M., Radomir, L., Moisescu, O. I., & Ringle, C. M. (2022). Latent class analysis in PLS-SEM: A review and recommendations for future applications. Journal of Business Research, 138(August 2021), 398–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.051

Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. In Handbook of Market Research (Issue July). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57413-4_15

Schubring, S., Lorscheid, I., Meyer, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2016). The PLS agent: Predictive modeling with PLS-SEM and agent-based simulation. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4604–4612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.052

Sumarni, S., Pertiwi, S. T. Y., Rukiyah, Andika, W. D., Astika, R. T., Abdurrahman, & Umam, R. (2019). Behavior in early childhood (2-3) years: A case study on the use of gadgets in social environments. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 8(8), 384–404.

Sumarni, S., Ramadhani, R., Sazaki, Y., Astika, R. T., Andika, W. D., & Prasetiyo, A. E. (2019). Development of “child friendly ICT” textbooks to improve professional competence of teacher candidates: A case study of early childhood education program students. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(3), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.596095

Usyan, A. N. R., Santoso, Setiadi, G., & Pratama, H. (2022). The Effect of Online Learning Model Reading Questioning and Answering on Motivation and Learning Outcomes. Uniglobal Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 54–60. https://doi.org/10.53797/ujssh.v1i1.8.2022

Wang, X. M., Yu, X. H., Yu, D. dan, Hwang, G. J., & Lan, M. (2025). Does combining real and virtual experiments improve learning achievement in physics? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 46, 100661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100661

Wongsa, S., & Cojorn, K. (2024). Enhancing the Students ’ Problem-Solving Skills through Situation-Based Learning with the Six Thinking Hats Technique. Journal of Advance Sciences and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v4i2.447

Yadlowsky, S., Pellegrini, F., Lionetto, F., Braune, S., & Tian, L. (2020). Estimation and Validation of Ratio-based Conditional Average Treatment Effects Using Observational Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 116(533), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.2020.1772080

Yasin, M., Huda, S., Putra, F. G., Syazali, M., Umam, R., & Widyawati, S. (2020). IMPROVE Learning Model and Learning Independence: Influence and Interaction on Mathematics Problem-Solving Abilities in Islamic Boarding School. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1467(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1467/1/012003

Downloads

Published

2025-05-20