Impact of socio-economic background of the students on the integration of mathematics Ideas into the learning of physical electronics course
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v4i2.452Keywords:
Academic performance, Engineering education, Mathematics integration, Physical electronics, Socio-economic background.Abstract
Background: The socio-economic background of students plays an important role in shaping their mathematics skills, especially when combining mathematical ideas with learning physical electronics. However, many engineering programs do not consider students' earlier school experiences when they are admitted. Factors like family background, the type of school they went to, and their age are some reasons why it is difficult to connect mathematics to their learning in physical electronics.
Aim: This research aims to study how the socio-economic background of students affects their academic performance when they bring mathematical ideas into physical electronics education.
Method: The study focused on university students taking a physical electronics course in South Africa. A mixed-method approach was used, including semi-structured surveys and interviews, to collect students' opinions about combining mathematics with physical electronics.
Results: The results show that students' socio-economic backgrounds affect how well they can use mathematics in their learning. The findings include: 1) Students had different levels of preparation in mathematics and physics; 2) Performance differences were found between students from rural and urban schools, 3) Those with basic knowledge of mathematics and physics performed better when combining these concepts with physical electronics.
Conclusion: This study found that connecting mathematics to physical electronics helps students understand concepts better. It also introduces a model called the Socio-Economic Based Practical Reward Mathematics Integrative Model (SEB-PRMIM), which is designed to reduce the effects of socio-economic differences and improve mathematics integration in engineering education.
References
Amiena Bayat, Wynand Louw & Ravinder Rena (2014). The Impact of Socio-economic Factors on the Performance of Selected High School Learners in the Western Cape Province, South Africa, Journal of Human Ecology, 45:3, 183-196.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09709274.2014.11906692
Adeyeye, O. J., & Akanbi, I. (2024). The Future of Engineering Education: A Data Analytics Approach. Engineering Science & Technology Journal, 5(4), 1342-1356.
Balanis, C. A. (2016). Antenna theory: analysis and design. John wiley & sons.
Brand, B. R. (2020). Integrating science and engineering practices: outcomes from a collaborative professional development. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00210-x
Bütüner, S.Ö. & Uzun, S. (2011). Fen öğretiminde karşılaşılan matematik temelli sıkıntılar: Fen ve teknoloji öğretmenlerinin tecrübelerinden yansımalar. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 4(2), 262-272.
CAES (2020). Handbook and Administrative site for College of agriculture, Engineering and Science. South Africa: University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Cansız, M., Ozbaylanlı, B., & Çolakoğlu, M. H. (2019). Impact of school type on student academic achievement. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.7378
Coben, D. (2000). Mathematics or common sense? Researching ‘invisible’ mathematics through adults’ mathematics life histories. In Perspectives on adults learning mathematics, (pp. 53-66). Springer Netherlands.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Creswell J.W. & Plano Clark, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE publications.
Creswell, J.W., Plano Clark, V.L. & Garrett, A.L. (2008). Methodological issues in conducting mixed methods research. In Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications, pp. 66-83 Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE publications.
Davison, D.M., Miller, K.W. & Metheny, D.L. (1995). What does the integration of science
and mathematics really means? School Science and Mathematics, 95(5), 226-230.
Ersan, O., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2020). Socioeconomic status and beyond: A multilevel analysis of TIMSS mathematics achievement given student and school context in Turkey. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 8(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-020-00093-y
Frykholm, J. & Glasson, G. (2005). Connecting science and mathematics instruction:
Pedagogical context knowledge for teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(3), 127–141.
Fasinu, V. G. (2021). Engineering Academics’ Teaching and Students' learning of Mathematical Modelling Approaches in Antenna Design Course. (PhD Thesis, UKZN, South Africa)
Fasinu, V. G., Govender, N., & Kumar, P. (2023). An empirically based practical-realistic pedagogic mathematical model for teaching and learning of an antenna theory and design course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), em2207. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12769
Fasinu, G. V., & Alant, B. P. (2023). University electronics engineering students’ approaches of integrating mathematical ideas into the learning of physical electronics in basic electronics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), em2214. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12797
Fateel, M., Mukallid, S., & Arora, B. (2021). The Interaction Between Socioeconomic Status and Preschool Education on Academic Achievement of Elementary School Students. International Education Studies, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n8p60
Gómez, S. G., García López, O., Díez Vega, I., Redondo Duarte, S., & Lavandera Ponce, S. (2022). The impact of gender and academic degrees on the performance of transversal competencies in higher education students.
Hascoët, M., Giaconi, V., & Jamain, L. (2020). Family socioeconomic status and parental expectations affect mathematics achievement in a national sample of Chilean students. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025420965731
Hasibuan, F. A. A., Suhartono, S., & Umayaroh, S. (2022). Hubungan Tingkat Pendidikan Orang Tua dengan Prestasi Belajar Siswa Kelas V SDN. Jurnal Pembelajaran, Bimbingan, Dan Pengelolaan Pendidikan, 2(8), Article 8. https://doi.org/10.17977/um065v2i82022p813-818
Hestenes, D. (2003). Oersted Medal Lecture 2002: Reforming the mathematical language of physics. American Journal of Physics, 71(2), 104-121.
Jeevarathinam, N., Shanmugam, K., & Saravanan, B. (2023). Case Study: Factors Affecting the Behavior of School Students in the Age of Pre-Adolescence. International Journal of Humanities and Education Development (IJHED), 5(6), 90-98.
Jeong, J. S., & González‐Gómez, D. (2021). Flipped-OCN Method in Mathematics Learning to Analyze the Attitudes of Pre-Service Teachers. Mathematics, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/math9060607
Ji, H., & Li, S. (2023). The Effect of Gender on Math Performance—Research based on College Advanced Mathematics Scores. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/4/2022276
Joshi, D. R., Chapai, K. P. S., & Khanal, B. (2022). Effect of Mathematics Teachers’ Problems in Teaching Equation, Figure, Drawing Symbols and Use of Software on Mathematical Content Instruction. Journal of Fine Arts Campus, 4(2), 11–20.
Jurdak, M. (2014). Socio-economic and cultural mediators of mathematics achievement and between-school equity in mathematics education at the global level. ZDM, 46(7), 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0593-z
Kang, H., & Cogan, L. (2022). The Differential Role of Socioeconomic Status in the Relationship between Curriculum-Based Mathematics and Mathematics Literacy: The Link Between TIMSS and PISA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10133-2
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Kıray, S.A. (2012). A new model for the integration of science and mathematics: The balance model. Energy education. Science and Technology Part B. Social and Educational Studies, 4(3), 1181-1196
Kıray, S. A. (2010). İlköğretim ikinci kademede uygulanan fen ve matematik entegrasyonunun etkililiği, (PhD thesis). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Kıray, S. A., Gök, B., Çalışkan, İ., & Kaptan, F. (2008). Perceptions of science and mathematics teachers about the relations between what courses for qualified science mathematics education in elementary schools. Further Education in the Balkan Countries, 2, 889-896.
Kurt, K. & Pehlivan, M. (2013). Integrated programs for science and mathematics: Review of related literature. Online Submission, 1(2), 116-121.
LasFever, K. S. (2008). Interdisciplinary teacher education: Reform in the global Age (PhD thesis). USA: Miami University.
Lee, C. N. (2023). Effects of educational governance on learning outcome and educational segregation in Taiwan. ScienceOpen Preprints. https://doi.org/10.14293/pr2199.000432.v1
Lindberg, L. (2007). To search for mathematics teaching and learning in vocational education. In C.
Bergsten, & B. Grevholm (Eds.). Developing and researching quality in mathematics teaching and learning. Proceedings of MADIF5, the 5th Swedish Mathematics Education. Research Seminar, pp. 94-102.
Meisel, E.M. (2005). A study of the continuum of integration of mathematics content with science concepts at the middle school level in West Virginia. ProQuest dissertations
Mills, J.E. & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Engineering education: Is problem-based or project-based learning the answer. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 3(2), 2-16.
Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H. H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2014). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Engineering in pre-college settings: Synthesizing research, policy, and practices (pp. 35-60). Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq7bh.7
Pant, B. P. (2017). Doing, teaching, learning and thinking about mathematics–On becoming a transformative teacher. Journal of Education and Research, 7(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.3126/jer.v7i1.21237
Pepin, B., Biehler, R., & Gueudet, G. (2021). Mathematics in engineering education: A review of the recent literature with a view towards innovative practices. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 7(2), 163-188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40753-021-00139-8
Price, R. L. (2022). A Causal-Comparative Study: The Effects of School Type and School Climate on Mathematical Achievement. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/doctoral/3739/
Repko, A.F. & Szostak, R. (2016). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory, pp. 1-335. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Redish, E. F., & Kuo, E. (2015). Language of physics, language of math: Disciplinary culture and dynamic epistemology. Science & Education, 24, 561-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9749-7
Poth, C. N. (Ed.). (2023). The Sage handbook of mixed methods research design. SAGE Publications Limited. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529614572
Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8
Ren, Y., Zhang, F., Jiang, Y., & Huang, S. (2021). Family socioeconomic status, educational expectations, and academic achievement among Chinese rural-to-urban migrant adolescents: The protective role of subjective socioeconomic status. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 41(8), 1129-1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431620983459
Ríordáin, M. N., Johnston, J., & Walshe, G. (2015). Making mathematics and science integration happen: key aspects of practice. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 47(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2015.1078001
Rojko, C. (2004). Significance of the use of technology in Mathematics in vocational education and some practical illustrations. Slovenia: The National Education Institute Slovenia.
Shala, A., & Latifi, F. (2021). Does Socioeconomic Status Influence Achievement? An analysis of the Performance of Kosovar Students on the 2015 and 2018 PISA Assessment. Revija Za Elementarno Izobraževanje, 4(4). https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.14.4.393-408.2021
Shimizu, Y., Vithal, R. (2023). School Mathematics Curriculum Reforms: Widespread Practice But Under Researched in Mathematics Education. In: Shimizu, Y., Vithal, R. (eds) Mathematics Curriculum Reforms Around the World. New ICMI Study Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13548-4_1
Sitopu, J. W., Khairani, M., Roza, M., Judijanto, L., & Aslan, A. (2024). The importance of integrating mathematical literacy in the primary education curriculum: A literature review. International Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 121-134.
Suh,J., Matson, K., Seshaiyer, P., Jamieson, S., & Tate, H. (2021). Mathematical modeling as a catalyst for equitable mathematics instruction: Preparing teachers and young learners with 21st-century skills. Mathematics, 9(2), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9020162
Tomaszewski, W., Xiang, N., & Kubler, M. (2024). Socio-economic status, school performance, and university participation: Evidence from linked administrative and survey data from Australia. Higher Education, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01245-7
Vadivel, B., Alam, S., Nikpoo, I., & Ajanil, B. (2023). The impact of low socioeconomic background on a child’s Educational achievements. Education Research International, 2023(1), 6565088. https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/6565088
Valero, P., Graven, M., Jurdak, M., Martin, D., Meaney, T., Penteado, M. (2015). Socioeconomic Influence on Mathematical Achievement: What Is Visible and What Is Neglected. In: Cho, S. (eds) The Proceedings of the 12th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12688-3_19
Wang, W., Dong, Y., Liu, X., Bai, Y., & Zhang, L. (2020). The effect of parents’ education on the academic and non-cognitive outcomes of their children: Evidence from China. Children and Youth Services Review, 117, 105307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105307
Wang, Y., Pan, L., Wan, S., Yi, H., Yang, F., He, H., Li, Z., Yong, Z., & Shan, G. (2020). Association of Socioeconomic Status and Overweight/Obesity in Rural-to-Urban Migrants: Different Effects by Age at Arrival. Frontiers in Public Health, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.622941
Wicklein, R.C. & Schell, J.W. (1995). Case studies of multidisciplinary approaches to integrating mathematics, science, technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 6(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v6i2.a.5
Ye, H., Liang, B., Ng, O. L., & Chai, C. S. (2023). Integration of computational thinking in K-12 mathematics education: A systematic review on CT-based mathematics instruction and student learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00396-w
Treacy, P., & O’Donoghue, J. (2013). Authentic Integration: a model for integrating mathematics and science in the classroom. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 703–718. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2013.868543
Zeng, J. (2023). Predicting Student Performance: Analyzing Socio-economic and Personal Factors. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 42, 170–178.
Zhang, M., Hu, Y., & Hu, Y. (2023). The Influences of Socioeconomic Status on Parental Educational Expectations: Mediating and Moderating Effects. Sustainability, 15(16), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612308
Zhou, Z. (2006). Integration of math and physics into electronic engineering technology courses. In ASEE Southeast Section Conference (pp. 01-03).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
