Cooperative learning implementation to improve an achievements of students on science competition

Authors

  • Durrul Jauhariyah Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Bandar Lampung
  • Dardiri Dardiri Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Bandar Lampung
  • Andika Eko Prasetiyo Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Melbourne
  • Fitria Lestari Universitas Muhammadiyah Lampung
  • Jutamat Sutduean Dhurakij Pundit University, Bangkok
  • Thanaporn Sriyakul Mahanakorn University of Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v1i2.39

Keywords:

Cooperative Learning, STAD, Jigsaw II, TGT, Student Achievement, Science Competition

Abstract

The number of student achievements in competition is one indicator to see the quality of learning in a school. This study aims to see the extent to which the application of cooperative learning in improving students' ability to face physics olympiad and other competitions. The sample consisted of 12 students who were prepared to compete and were taken from 3 different grade levels namely 10th grade, 11th grade, and 12th grade in one of the State Madrasah Aliyah (MAN) in Bandar Lampung City. The 12 students were divided into 2: 6 students in the experimental class and 6 in the control class. The study used a type of Quasi Experiment with the design of One Group Pretest-Posttest Design. Learning is done by applying three types of cooperative learning, namely Student Team Achievement Division (STAD), Jigsaw II type, and Teams Games Tournament (TGT) type with a total of 24 meetings. The results of the learning process are obtained from the results of the pre-test given to all students. In the pre-test, it was divided into 2 types, namely: Pre-test grub and Individual Pre-Test. Pre-Test grub is a test that answers questions quickly, precisely, and carefully. In the Pre-test grub, it is done by dividing 12 students into 4 grub (3 students/grub). Pre-Test grub is a simulation of LCT (Lomba Cepat Tepat). Pre-Test grub is an application of cooperative learning method type (TGT) which aims to train speed in answering questions correctly. Individual Pre-Test is Pre-Test which is done by giving students a question sheet to answer. Both types of Pre -Test are given 120 minutes each. After doing the Pre-Test, students test results were evaluated to find out the deficiencies in understanding. Furthermore, the re-learning process is given again in the form of repetition and reinforcement of material that is poorly understood before the Post-Test (grub and individual) is carried out. The results showed that there were differences in understanding the theory and test scores based on differences based on class level, the number of participants in learning activities, and the number of students practicing answering questions. The results of this study were then correlated with their achievements from the results of physics competitions at various events. The results showed that cooperative learning methods with 3 types, namely: type (STAD), type Jigsaw II, and type (TGT) can improve achievement in physics competitions. The conclusions of these results, obtained from the results of the scores on the grub or LCT competitions conducted at different times and places, and also from the results of the comparison of physics olympiad scores (individual competition). The results of this study show that the cooperative learning model has a positive impact on student achievement.

References

Abdurrahman, A., Saregar, A., & Umam, R. (2018). The effect of feedback as soft scaffolding on ongoing assessment toward the quantum physics concept mastery of the prospective physics teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 41–47.

Abrami *, P. C., Poulsen, C., & Chambers, B. (2004). Teacher motivation to implement an educational innovation: Factors differentiating users and non-users of cooperative learning. Educational Psychology, 24(2), 201–216.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.

Clare, M. M. (2009). Decolonizing consultation: Advocacy as the strategy, diversity as the context. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 19(1), 8–25.

Gillies, R. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39-54.

Gull, F., & Shehzad, S. (2015). Effects of cooperative learning on students’ academic achievement. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 9(3), 246–255.

Guvenc, H. (2010). The effects of cooperative learning and learning journals on teacher candidates’ self-regulated learning. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 10(3), 1477–1487.

Harahap, R. A., & Derlina, D. (2017). Pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group investigation (GI) dengan metode know-want-learn (KWL): Dampak terhadap hasil belajar fluida dinamis. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-BiRuNi, 6(2), 149-158.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Irwansyah, I., Sukarmin, S., & Harjana, H. (2018). Development of three-tier diagnostics instruments on students misconception test in fluid concept. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2), 207–217.

Jatmiko, A., Kartina, Y., Irwandani, I., Fakhri, J., Pricilia, A., & Rahayu, T. (2018). Reading concept map-think pair share (remap-TPS) learning model on cognitive ability and scientific attitude. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 3(2), 183–195.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (2014). Cooperative learning: Improving university instruction by basing practice on validated theory. Journal on Excellence in University Teaching, 25(4), 1–26.

Jolliffe, I. (2005). Principal component analysis. Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science.

Mehta, S., & Kulshrestha, A. K. (2014). Implementation of cooperative learning in science: A developmental-cum-experimental study. Education Research International, 2014, 1-8.

Nguyen, P., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2006). Culturally appropriate pedagogy: The case of group learning in a Confucian Heritage Culture context. Intercultural Education, 17(1), 1–19.

Price, M., Handley, K., Millar, J., & O’Donovan, B. (2010). Feedback: All that effort, but what is the effect?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(3), 277–289.

Putra, F., Kholifah, I. Y. N., Subali, B., & Rusilowati, A. (2018). 5E-learning cycle strategy: Increasing conceptual understanding and learning motivation. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(2), 171–181.

Ramadhanti, D., & Yanda, D. P. (2018). Understanding poetry through the use of cooperative learning model. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3), 436-446.

Retnowati, E. (2018). Designing worked examples for learning tangent lines to circles. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1), 1-6.

Retnowati, E. (2017). Faded-example as a tool to acquire and automate mathematics knowledge. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 824(1), 1-7.

Retnowati, E., Fathoni, Y., & Chen, O. (2018). Mathematics problem solving skill acquisition: Learning by Problem Posing or by Problem Solving?. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(1), 1-10.

Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223–246.

Sahin, A. (2010). Effects of jigsaw II technique on academic achievement and attitudes to written expression course. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(12), 777.

Sari, D. K., Supahar, S., & Ralmugiz, U. (2018). The influence of android-based isomorphic physics (forfis) application on analogical transfer and self-diagnosis skill of students at SMA negeri 3 Kupang. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 154–161.

Sari, H. K. (2016). Peningkatan keterampilan proses sains dan hasil belajar fisika siswa pada model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe student team achievement division. Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 1(1), 15–22.

Slavin, R. E. (2010). Cooperative learning: What makes group-work work. (The Nature of Learning: Using Research to Inspire Practice, 161–178).

Sulisworo, D., & Suryani, F. (2014). The effect of cooperative learning, motivation and information technology literacy to achievement. International Journal of Learning and Development, 4(2), 58–64.

Suryandari, K. C., Sajidan, S., Rahardjo, S. B., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Fatimah, S. (2018). Project-based science learning and pre-service teachers’science literacy skill and creative thinking. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3), 345-355.

Syed, A. A., Alvina, A., & Amnda, A. (2017). Career transition program for special educational needs learning disabilities students. European Journal of Pharmaceutical and Medical Research, 4(11), 595–601.

Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review, 9(1), 1–15.

Tompo, B., Ahmad, A., & Muris, M. (2016). The development of discovery-inquiry learning model to reduce the science misconceptions of junior high school students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(12), 5676–5686.

Tran, V. D. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement and knowledge retention. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 131–140.

Triarini, W. D., Degeng, I. N. S., Efendi, M., & Toenlioe, A. J. E. (2017). The effectiveness on the use of multimedia to improve basic reading skill of hearing-impaired students. European Journal of Special Education Research, 2(5), 36-49.

ul Haq, M. A., & Saad, I. (2015). Impact of cooperative learning teaching methods on 7th grade students’ academic achievement: An experimental study. Journal of Elementary Education, 26(1), 89-112.

Vaughan, F. (2002). What is spiritual intelligence? Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42(2), 16–33.

Widiana, I. W., Jampel, I. N., & Prawini, I. P. (2018). The effectiveness of traditional game-based communication learning activity for cognitive process dimension learning achievement. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(2), 260–269.

Zulva, R. (2016). Hubungan antara keterampilan berpikir rasional siswa SMA dengan hasil belajar dalam pembelajaran kooperatif menggunakan constructive feedback. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 5(1), 61–69.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-02

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License

Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.