The effect of integrating society, science, environment, technology, and collaborative mind mapping (ISSETCM2) model on mathematical literacy in terms of adversity quotient

Authors

  • Nur Hayati Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung
  • Bambang Sri Anggoro UIN Raden Intan Lampung
  • Khoirunnisa Imama Universitas Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v2i2.118

Keywords:

ISSETCM2, Mathematical Literacy Ability and Adversity Quotient

Abstract

The implementation of this study aims to ensure the effectiveness of the Integrating Society, Science, Environment, Technology, and Collaborative Mind Mapping (ISSETCM2) learning model on mathematical literacy skills in terms of adversity quotient (AQ). This research design is quasi-experimental, with the population being all eighth-grade students in the academic year 2021/2022. The research sample was selected by cluster random. The average value of the mathematical literacy ability of the experimental class students is 72.03, and that of the control class is 50.34. Based on data interpretation and analysis of variance (ANOVA) of two-path unequal cells with a significant value of . The value of Sig is 0.001, so Sig . Based on the data, there are differences in the results of mathematical literacy skills between the learning model (ISSETCM2) and direct instruction learning models. Also, there are differences in adversity quotient categories (climbers, campers, and quitters) on mathematical literacy abilities. There is no interaction between learning model factors and adversity quotient on the results of students' mathematical literacy abilities. From these data, it can be concluded that there is an effect of the ISSETCM2 learning model on mathematical literacy skills in terms of the adversity quotient of class VIII. The research results show that each student has a different adversity quotient, which can affect students' mathematical reasoning abilities. For this reason, students need to know the adversity quotient to maximize their abilities.

References

Ahmar, AS, Rahman, A., & Mulbar, U. (2018). The analysis of students' logical thinking ability and adversity quotient, and it is reviewed from cognitive style. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1028 (1), 012167. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012167

Anggraini, TW, & Mahmudi, A. (2021). Exploring the Students' Adversity Quotient in Online Mathematics Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education , 6 (3), 221-238. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i3.13617

Anggoro, BS (2016). Analisis Persepsi Siswa SMP terhadap Pembelajaran Matematika Ditinjau dari Perbedaan Gender dan Disposisi Berpikir Kreatif Matematis. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 153–166.

Arsana, IK, Suarjana, M., & Arini, NW (2019). Pengaruh Penggunaan Mind Mapping berbantuan Alat Peraga Tangga Garis Bilangan terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika. International Journal of Elementary Education, 3(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v3i2.18511

Fauziah, M., Marmoah, S., Murwaningsih, T., & Saddhono, K. (2020). The Effect of Thinking Actively in a Social Context and Creative Problem Solving Learning Models on Divergent-Thinking Skills Viewed from Adversity Quotient. European Journal of Educational Research , 9 (2), 537-568. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.537

Fitriyani, I., & Mastur, Z. (2017). Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa ditinjau dari kecerdasan emosional pada pembelajaran CPS berbantuan hands on activity. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(2), 139-147.

Florea, NM, & Hujui, E. (2015). Critical thinking in elementary school children. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences , 180 , 565-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.161

Gasiewski, JA, Eagan, MK, Garcia, GA, Hurtado, S., & Chang, MJ (2015). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multi-contextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in higher education , 53 (2), 229-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-011-9247-y

Hidayat, W., & Prabawanto, S. (2018). Improving students' creative mathematical reasoning abilities through adversity quotient and argument driven inquiry learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 948 (1), 012005. IOP Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/948/1/012005

Hulaikah, M., Degeng, I., & Murwani, FD (2020). The Effect of Experiential Learning and Adversity Quotient on Problem Solving Ability. International Journal of Instruction , 13 (1), 869-884. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13156a

Irwan, AP, Usman, U., & Amin, BD (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Menyelesaikan Soal Fisika Di SMAN 2 Bulukumba. Jurnal Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 15(3).

Kivunja, C. (2014). Do You Want Your Students to Be Job-Ready with 21st Century Skills? Change Pedagogies: A Pedagogical Paradigm Shift from Vygotskyian Social Constructivism to Critical Thinking, Problem Solving and Siemens' Digital Connectivism. International journal of higher education , 3 (3), 81-91. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n3p81

Komarudin, K., Monica, Y., Rinaldi, A., Rahmawati, ND, & Mutia, M. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis: Dampak Model Open Ended dan Adversity Quotient (AQ). AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 550-559. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i2.3241

Kusuma, D., Sukestiyarno, YL, & Cahyono, AN (2022). The Characteristics of Mathematical Literacy Based on Students' Executive Function. European Journal of Educational Research , 11 (1), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.193

Mansur, N. (2018). Melatih Literasi Matematika Siswa dengan Soal PISA. 1, 140–144.

Masfufah, R., & Afriansyah, EA (2021). Analisis kemampuan literasi matematis siswa melalui soal PISA. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 291-300.

https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v10i2.825

Masjaya, & Wardono. (2018). Pentingnya Kemampuan Literasi Matematika untuk Menumbuhkan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 568–574.

Mujib, Mardiyah, & Suherman. (2022). Model Integrating Society, Science, Environment, Technology And Collaborative Mind Mapping mempengaruhi Penalaran Matematis dan Multiple Intellegences Mujib1. Jurnal Pendidikan, 8(1), 110–129.

https://doi.org/10.55210/attalim.v8i1.769

Muzaki, A. (2019). Analisis Kemampuan Literasi Matematis Siswa Mosharafa : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Program for International Student ( Organisation for Economic Cooperation. Mosharafa : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 8(9), 493–502..

https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i3.557

Novita, R.,& Herman, T. (2021). Digital technology in learning mathematical literacy, can it help? In Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 177(1), 012027. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012027

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. OECD Publishing.

Ojose, B. (2017). Mathematics literacy: Are we able to put the mathematics we learn into everyday use. Journal of mathematics education, 4(1), 89-100.

Paul G. Stolz. (2018). Adversity Quotient : Turning Obstacles into Opportunities . PT. Grasindo.

Prabawati, MN, Herman, T., & Turmudi, T. (2019). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Siswa Berbasis Masalah dengan Strategi Heuristic untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematis. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v8i1.383

Pratama, GS, & Retnawati, H. (2018). Urgency of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) content analysis in mathematics textbook. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1097 , (1), 012147. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012147

Purnamasari, FE, Sujadi, I., & Slamet, I. (2019). Effect of adversity quotient of junior high school students on reflective thinking process in mathematical problem solving. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1321 (2), 022128. IOP Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1321/2/022128

Rahmawati, ND (2022). Pemecahan Masalah Literasi Matematis Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). CV Jejak.

Rahmawati, ND, Mardiyana, M., & Usodo, B. (2015). Profil siswa SMP dalam pemecahan masalah yang berkaitan dengan literasi matematis ditinjau dari adversity quotient (AQ). Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(5), 508-517.

Rahmawati, ND, Purnomo, T., & Kuntjoro, S. (2022). Profile of SETS approach to improve student's critical thinking skills during 2015 to 2022. IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research , 3 (3), 340-353. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v3i3.214

Rizki, LM, & Priatna, N. (2019). Mathematical literacy as the 21st century skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series , 1157 (4), 042088. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042088

Jailani, J., Retnawati, H., Wulandari, NF, & Djidu, H. (2020). Mathematical literacy proficiency development based on content, context, and process. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78 (1), 80-101. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.80

Rukmana, I., Hasbi, M., & Paloloang, B. (2016). Hubungan adversity quotient dengan hasil belajar matematika siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri Model Terpadu Madani Palu. Jurnal Elektronik Pendidikan Matematika Tadulako, 3(3), 325-333.

Safi'i, A., Muttaqin, I., Hamzah, N., Chotimah, C., Junaris, I., & Rifa'i, MK (2021). The effect of the adversity quotient on student performance, student learning autonomy and student achievement in the COVID-19 pandemic era: Evidence from Indonesia. Heliyon , 7 (12), e08510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08510

Setyawan, U. (2018). Strategi SMPIT Bina Anak Sholeh Yogyakarta Dalam Membudayakan Literasi Bagi Siswa. Saliha, I(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.54396/saliha.v1i1.6

Stacey, K., & Turner, R. (2015). The evolution and key concepts of the PISA mathematics framework. Assessing Mathematical Literacy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10121-7_1

Suharta, I., & Suarjana, I. (2018). A case study on mathematical literacy of prospective elementary school teachers. International Journal of Instruction , 11 (2), 413-424.

https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11228a

Suharyono, E., & Rosnawati, R. (2020). Analisis Buku Teks Pelajaran Matematika SMP ditinjau dari Literasi Matematika. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 451-462. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i3.819

Sumirattana, S., Makanong, A., & Thipkong, S. (2017). Using realistic mathematics education and the DAPIC problem-solving process to enhance secondary school students' mathematical literacy. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences , 38 (3), 307-315.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2016.06.001

Suryadi, B., & Santoso, TI (2017). Self-efficacy, adversity quotient, and students' achievement in mathematics. International Education Studies , 10 (10), 12-19.

https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n10p12

Suryaningrum, CW, Susanto, H., Ningtyas, YDWK, & Irfan, M. (2020). Semiotic reasoning emerges in constructing properties of a rectangle: A study of adversity quotient. Journal on Mathematics Education , 11 (1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9766.95-110

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30