Development of design thinking-based interactive digital media integrating kahoot! and heyzine flipbook to enhance students’ mathematical numeracy literacy through differentiated learning

Authors

  • Salma Millenia Utami Universitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia
  • Aryo Andri Nugroho Universitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia
  • Supandi Universitas PGRI Semarang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v6i2.1179

Keywords:

Design Thinking, Differentiated Learning, Interactive Digital Media, Mathematical Numeracy Literacy, Probability Learning

Abstract

Background: Mathematical numeracy literacy remains a major challenge in senior high school mathematics learning, particularly in interpreting data, analyzing probability events, and solving contextual problems. This issue is exacerbated by the limited availability of interactive digital learning media that support differentiated instruction and diverse learning needs.

Aims: This study aimed to develop and evaluate the feasibility of Design Thinking-based interactive digital media integrating Kahoot! and Heyzine Flipbook to enhance students’ mathematical numeracy literacy in probability learning.

Method: This study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach using the Design Thinking framework consisting of empathize, define, ideate, and prototype stages. The participants were 30 senior high school students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through observations, interviews, and validation questionnaires, then analyzed descriptively using qualitative and quantitative techniques.

Results: The developed media successfully integrated gamified evaluation and interactive visual materials within differentiated learning environments. Validation results showed highly feasible categories, with scores of 90% from media experts and 92% from material experts. The media effectively supported probability learning, increased student engagement, and strengthened mathematical numeracy literacy.

Conclusion: The developed interactive digital media have strong potential to support differentiated mathematics instruction and technology-enhanced numeracy learning in probability topics.

References

Abrahamson, D., & Abdu, R. (2021). Towards an ecological-dynamics design framework for embodied-interaction conceptual learning: The case of dynamic mathematics environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 1889–1923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09805-1

Algburi, A. H., Almekhlafi, A. G., & Jarrah, A. M. (2026). Transforming mathematics education through gamification: A study on motivation and learning among UAE sixth graders. Contemporary Educational Technology, 18(1), ep630. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/17923

Alghadari, F., Herman, T., & Prabawanto, S. (2020). Factors affecting senior high school students to solve three-dimensional geometry problems. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 15(3), em0590. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/8234

Baltador, L. A., Grecu, V., Panța, N. D., & Beju, A. M. (2024). Design thinking in education: Evaluating the impact on student entrepreneurship competencies. Education Sciences, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121311

Barana, A., Marchisio, M., & Sacchet, M. (2021). Interactive feedback for learning mathematics in a digital learning environment. Education Sciences, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11060279

Barumbun, M., & Kharisma, D. (2022). Procedural knowledge or conceptual knowledge? Developing the so-called proceptual knowledge in mathematics learning. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 15(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v15i2.472

Cadet, M. J. (2023). Application of game-based online learning platform: Kahoot a formative evaluation tool to assess learning. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 18(3), 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2023.03.009

Castro, M. P., & Zermeño, M. G. G. (2020). Challenge based learning: Innovative pedagogy for sustainability through e-learning in higher education. Sustainability, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104063

Çeken, B., & Taşkın, N. (2022). Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2

Chang, C.-Y., Kao, C.-H., & Hwang, G.-J. (2020). Facilitating students’ critical thinking and decision making performances: A flipped classroom for neonatal health care training. Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 32–46.

Chang, I. (2023). Early numeracy and literacy skills and their influences on fourth-grade mathematics achievement: A moderated mediation model. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 11(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00168-6

Cirkony, C., Tytler, R., & Hubber, P. (2022). Designing and delivering representation-focused science lessons in a digital learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(3), 881–908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10094-z

Conceição, A. C. (2021). Dynamic and interactive tools to support teaching and learning. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/mca27010001

Dasgupta, I., Schulz, E., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gershman, S. J. (2020). A theory of learning to infer. Psychological Review, 127(3), 412–441. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000178

Díaz Palencia, J. L., & Ordoñez Ontiveros, Y. (2024). A classroom experience about the application of research-based learning for the teaching of probability in engineering. STEM Education, 4(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2024008

Donkin, R., & Rasmussen, R. (2021). Student perception and the effectiveness of Kahoot!: A scoping review in histology, anatomy, and medical education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 14(5), 572–585. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2094

Elbehary, S. G. A. (n.d.). Reasoning under uncertainty within the context of probability education: A case study of preservice mathematics teachers. Pythagoras, 42(1), 630. https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v42i1.630

Geiger, V., & Schmid, M. (2024). A critical turn in numeracy education and practice. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1363566

Gheyssens, E., Coubergs, C., Griful-Freixenet, J., Engels, N., & Struyven, K. (2022). Differentiated instruction: The diversity of teachers’ philosophy and praxis to adapt teaching to students’ interests, readiness and learning profiles. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(14), 1383–1400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1812739

Ginting, D., Sabudu, D., Barella, Y., Madkur, A., Woods, R., & Sari, M. K. (2024). Student-centered learning in the digital age: In-class adaptive instruction and best practices. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(3), 2006. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.27497

Goyibova, N., Muslimov, N., Sabirova, G., Kadirova, N., & Samatova, B. (2025). Differentiation approach in education: Tailoring instruction for diverse learner needs. MethodsX, 14, 103163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103163

Grecu, Y. V. (2023). Differentiated instruction: Curriculum and resources provide a roadmap to help English teachers meet students’ needs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 125, 104064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104064

Grotlüschen, A., Desjardins, R., & Liu, H. (2020). Literacy and numeracy: Global and comparative perspectives. International Review of Education, 66(2), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-020-09854-x

He, S., & Xin, Y. P. (2025). Design knowledge scaffolds to facilitate students’ probabilistic thinking skills for solving classical probability problems: An exploratory study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 58, 101928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101928

Irmawan, I., Mering, A., & Astuti, I. (2022). The development of interactive learning multimedia based on the website for mathematics’ subject in junior high school. Journal of Education, Teaching and Learning, 7(1), 108–119. https://doi.org/10.26737/jetl.v7i1.2709

Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., Fidalgo, P., & Ali, N. (2024). Gamifying mathematics education through Kahoot: Fostering motivation and achievement in the classroom. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 20, 010. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2025.20010

Kalleny, N. K. (2020). Advantages of Kahoot! game-based formative assessments along with methods of its use and application during the COVID-19 pandemic in various live learning sessions. Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure, 8(4), 175. https://doi.org/10.4103/JMAU.JMAU_61_20

Kazak, S., & Pratt, D. (2021). Developing the role of modelling in the teaching and learning of probability. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1802328

Kim, H. J., Yi, P., & Hong, J. I. (2020). Students’ academic use of mobile technology and higher-order thinking skills: The role of active engagement. Education Sciences, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10030047

Kwangmuang, P., Jarutkamolpong, S., Sangboonraung, W., & Daungtod, S. (2021). The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools. Heliyon, 7(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309

Lai, C.-P., Zhang, W., & Chang, Y.-L. (2020). Differentiated instruction enhances sixth-grade students’ mathematics self-efficacy, learning motives, and problem-solving skills. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 48(6), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.9094

Lashari, T. A., Fiayaz, R., Lashari, S. A., Khan, I., Sultana, S., & Afzal, T. (2024). Kahoot: A game-based web tool to assess motivation, engagement fun, and learning outcomes among engineers. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 32(2), e22684. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22684

Lee, J. Y., Pyon, C. U., & Woo, J. (2023). Digital twin for math education: A study on the utilization of games and gamification for university mathematics education. Electronics, 12(15). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12153207

Letchumanan, M., Husain, S. K. S., Ayub, A. F. M., Kamaruddin, R., & Zulkifli, N. N. (2023). Determining the factors that promote higher order thinking skills in mathematics technology enhanced learning environment: Perspective from university students. Malaysian Journal of Mathematical Sciences, 17(1), 13–23. https://doi.org/10.47836/mjms.17.1.02

Licorish, S., & Lötter, A. (2022). When does Kahoot! provide most value for classroom dynamics, engagement, and motivation?: IS students’ and lecturers’ perceptions. Journal of Information Systems Education, 33(3), 245–260.

Lin, L., Shen, S., Shadiev, R., & Yu, M. (2025). Review of research on design thinking in K–12 education. Educational Research Review, 47, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100682

Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2020). A comparison of flipped learning with gamification, traditional learning, and online independent study: The effects on students’ mathematics achievement and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541910

Lu, K., Ji, T., Lu, F., & Shadiev, R. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: The mediating role of learning engagement between technology usage approaches and higher order thinking skills in a technology-enhanced inquiry-based learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 73(5), 2929–2949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10533-7

Manfreda Kolar, V., & Hodnik, T. (2021). Mathematical literacy from the perspective of solving contextual problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 467–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.467

Maswadi, K., Gulzar, Y., Hakim, T., & Mir, M. S. (2026). Digital experiential learning ecosystems and perceived sustainability outcomes: A partial mediation model of learning engagement. Sustainability, 18(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083738

May, B. M. (n.d.). Retrieval practice and test-potentiated learning: A comparison of high and low prior topic knowledge students in terms of procedural fluency and conceptual understanding. Pythagoras, 45(1), 755. https://doi.org/10.4102/PYTHAGORAS.v45i1.755

McLaughlin, J. E., Chen, E., Lake, D., Guo, W., Skywark, E. R., Chernik, A., & Liu, T. (2022). Design thinking teaching and learning in higher education: Experiences across four universities. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0265902. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265902

Meryansumayeka, Zulkardi, Putri, R. I. I., & Hiltrimartin, C. (2022). Designing geometrical learning activities assisted with ICT media for supporting students’ higher order thinking skills. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp135-148

Mohammadi Zenouzagh, Z., Admiraal, W., & Saab, N. (2023). Learner autonomy, learner engagement and learner satisfaction in text-based and multimodal computer mediated writing environments. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 14283–14323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11615-w

Niyazova, G. Z., Duisekeyeva, B. M., Berdi, D. K., Usembayeva, I. B., & Mindetbayeva, A. A. (2026). The effects of gamified AI-supported digital learning environments on personalized learning and student engagement in school education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1754080

Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: An overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413–454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329

Nurcahyo, A., Ishartono, N., Pratiwi, A. Y. C., & Waluyo, M. (2024). Exploration of mathematical concepts in Batik Truntum Surakarta. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 457–476. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v13i2.p457-476

Odekeye, O., & Jita, T. (2025). Reimagining pedagogical strategies: YouTube-based edutainment in learning difficulty concepts in secondary school mathematics in Nigeria. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.11.1

Ogunsola, J. A., & Adigun, O. T. (2025). Effect of critical thinking skills on numerate behaviours among management and business-related higher education students: A Nigerian case. Cogent Education, 12(1), 2492713. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2492713

Pan, Z., Wang, K., Zhu, J., & Smith, M. (2026). Levels, stickers, and strategies: How gamified math tasks foster elementary student engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 31(6), 1687–1709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13866-1

Pellas, N. (2024). Effects of Kahoot! on K–12 students’ mathematics achievement and multi-screen addiction. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti8090081

Pozas, M., Löffler, P., Schnotz, W., & Kauertz, A. (2020). The effects of context-based problem-solving tasks on students’ interest and metacognitive experiences. Open Education Studies, 2(1), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2020-0118

Rau, M. A. (2020). Comparing multiple theories about learning with physical and virtual representations: Conflicting or complementary effects? Educational Psychology Review, 32(2), 297–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09517-1

Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (2023). Numeracy, gist, literal thinking and the value of nothing in decision making. Nature Reviews Psychology, 2(7), 421–439. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-023-00188-7

Rubel, L. H., & McCloskey, A. V. (2021). Contextualization of mathematics: Which and whose world? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10041-4

Russo, B., Valentín, M. G., & Tellez-Álvarez, J. (2021). The relevance of grated inlets within surface drainage systems in the field of urban flood resilience: A review of several experimental and numerical simulation approaches. Sustainability, 13(13). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137189

Sakurai, J., & Goos, M. (2023). Revisiting tools in numeracy learning: The role of authentic digital tools. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1291407

Salar, R., & Turgut, U. (2021). Effect of differentiated instruction and 5E learning cycle on academic achievement and self-efficacy of students in physics lesson. Science Education International, 32(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i1.1

Sari, A. D., Suryadi, D., & Dasari, D. (2024). Learning obstacle of probability learning based on the probabilistic thinking level. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226

Setambah, M. A. B., Saad, M. I. M., Ghazali, N. H. binti C. M., & Adnan, M. (2025). A comprehensive synthesis of differentiated instruction approaches in mathematics. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 12(4), 3. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.12.4.2371

Sharna, S., Sharma, S., Doyle, P., Marcelo, L., & Kumar, D. (2021). Teaching and learning probability using games: A systematic review of research from 2010–2020. Waikato Journal of Education, 26(2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v26i2.881

Smets, W., De Neve, D., & Struyven, K. (2022). Responding to students’ learning needs: How secondary education teachers learn to implement differentiated instruction. Educational Action Research, 30(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1848604

Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability, 12(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113

Szollosi, A., Donkin, C., & Newell, B. R. (2023). Toward nonprobabilistic explanations of learning and decision-making. Psychological Review, 130(2), 546–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000355

Vu, H. X. (2025). Leveraging technology for higher-order thinking development: Instructional design strategies in higher education. The International Journal of Technologies in Learning, 32(2), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.18848/2327-0144/CGP/v32i02/25-46

Wong, B. S., Chue, K. L., Ali, R. B., & Lee, P. (2023). Differentiated instruction: A comparison of motivation and perceived competence between students with high and low readiness levels. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 22(1), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-022-09323-2

Woods, P. J., & Copur-Gencturk, Y. (2024). Examining the role of student-centered versus teacher-centered pedagogical approaches to self-directed learning through teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 138, 104415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104415

Zainuddin, Z., Shujahat, M., Haruna, H., & Chu, S. K. W. (2020). The role of gamified e-quizzes on student learning and engagement: An interactive gamification solution for a formative assessment system. Computers & Education, 145, 103729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103729

Zhao, L., Liu, X., & Su, Y.-S. (2021). The differentiate effect of self-efficacy, motivation, and satisfaction on pre-service teacher students’ learning achievement in a flipped classroom: A case of a modern educational technology course. Sustainability, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052888

Zhou, H. (2025). Exploring the dynamic teaching-learning relationship in interactive learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(7), 4363–4393. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2462149

Zorzos, M., & Avgerinos, E. (2023). Research on visualization in probability problem solving. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(4), em2247. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13066

Downloads

Published

2026-05-20