Exploring the dynamics of didactic practices in ratio learning: a qualitative study of teachers’ instructional strategies and student engagement in junior secondary mathematics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58524/jasme.v6i2.1129Keywords:
Didactic Practices, Instructional Strategies, Mathematics Instruction, Ratio Learning, Student EngagementAbstract
Background: The teaching of ratio remains a significant challenge in mathematics education, as students often struggle to understand multiplicative relationships and tend to rely on procedural reasoning rather than conceptual understanding. Previous studies have mainly focused on students’ conceptual difficulties, while limited attention has been given to how teachers’ didactic practices influence students’ engagement and understanding.
Aims: This study aims to analyze the dynamics of didactical practices in ratio learning, focusing on instructional strategies, classroom interaction, and student engagement, and offers a novel contribution by examining how didactical practices shape variations in student engagement in real classroom contexts.
Method: This research employed a qualitative case study design involving one mathematics teacher and 28 seventh-grade students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and documentation, and analyzed using thematic analysis.
Results: The findings indicate that teaching practices were dominated by direct instruction combined with contextual examples, which supported initial understanding but limited deeper conceptual exploration. Approximately 60% of students were actively engaged, while the others tended to be passive. Student interaction was mostly procedural, and the use of a reward system increased participation but encouraged performance-oriented behavior.
Conclusion: These findings highlight the important role of didactic practices in shaping students’ engagement and understanding of ratio. It is recommended that teachers adopt more student-centered approaches, such as structured discussions and contextual problem-solving, to enhance conceptual understanding and equitable participation in mathematics learning.
References
Atoyebi, O. M., & Atoyebi, S. B. (2022). The link between mathematics teaching strategies and students’ anxiety. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2022/v33i4716
Aulia, G. P., & Pramuditya, S. A. (2025). Interactive learning media using Google Sites to enhance students’ understanding of ratio concepts in grade VII. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1).
Baigi, F., Yeganeh, M., & Bemanian, M. (2024). Internet-based infrastructures and online architectural education on design studios: Perceived instructional strategies and students engagement. Frontiers in Built Environment, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1463658
Bakker, A., Cai, J., & Zenger, L. (2021). Future themes of mathematics education research: An international survey before and during the pandemic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10049-w
Bakker, A., & Wagner, D. (2020). Pandemic: Lessons for today and tomorrow? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09946-3
Barwell, R. (2025). Investigating stratification in mathematics classroom discourse: A second language mathematics class in Canada. Proceedings of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1.
Begolli, K. N., Dai, T., McGinn, K. M., & Booth, J. L. (2021). Could probability be out of proportion? Self-explanation and example-based practice help students with lower proportional reasoning skills learn probability. Instructional Science, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09550-9
Bishop, J. P. (2021). Responsiveness and intellectual work: Features of mathematics classroom discourse related to student achievement. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2021.1922413
Boaler, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2022). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students’ potential through creative mathematics, inspiring messages and innovative teaching (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
Braithwaite, D. W., Sprague, L., & Siegler, R. S. (2021). Toward a unified theory of rational number arithmetic. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 48(10). https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0001073
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Cai, J. (2023). What research says about teaching mathematics through problem posing. Educación Matemática, 35(3). https://doi.org/10.24844/EM3503.01
Canonigo, A. (2024). Teacher positioning, student engagement, and mathematics identity development in online mathematics classrooms. American Journal of Distance Education, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2024.2303325
Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2022). Student engagement in a flipped secondary mathematics classroom. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10213-x
Chen, G., & Chan, C. K. K. (2022). Visualization- and analytics-supported video-based professional development for promoting mathematics classroom discourse. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2022.100609
Chen, G., Chan, C. K. K., Chan, K. K. H., Clarke, S. N., & Resnick, L. B. (2020). Efficacy of video-based teacher professional development for increasing classroom discourse and student learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2020.1783269
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Demelash, M., Andargie, D., & Belachew, W. (2024). Enhancing secondary school students’ engagement in chemistry through 7E context-based instructional strategy supported with simulation. Pedagogical Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14146
Díez-Palomar, J., Chan, M. C. E., Clarke, D., & Padrós, M. (2021). How does dialogical talk promote student learning during small group work? An exploratory study. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100540
Díez-Palomar, J., Font Palomar, M., Aubert, A., & Garcia-Yeste, C. (2022). Dialogic scientific gatherings: The promotion of scientific literacy among children. SAGE Open, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221121783
Dobashi, K., Ho, C. P., Fulford, C. P., Lin, M. F. G., & Higa, C. (2022). Synchronization ratio of time-series cross-section and teaching material clickstream for visualization of student engagement. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 13356. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11647-6_22
Dobashi, Y., Yao, D., Petel, Y., Nguyen, T. N., Sarwar, M. S., Thabet, Y., Ng, C. L. W., Glitz, E. S., Nguyen, G. T. M., Plesse, C., Vidal, F., Michal, C. A., & Madden, J. D. W. (2022). Piezoionic mechanoreceptors: Force-induced current generation in hydrogels. Science, 376(6592). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaw1974
Ferri, R. B., Pede, S., & Lipowsky, F. (2021). Effects of interleaved learning on procedural and conceptual knowledge of learners about proportionality. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13138-020-00162-3
Fosnot, C. T., & Perry, R. S. (2023). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). CRC Taylor & Francis Group.
Fredrick, J. W., Becker, S. P., & Langberg, J. M. (2022). Low school support exacerbates the association between peer difficulties and sluggish cognitive tempo in adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 51(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2021.1923021
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., Paris, A. H., Torto, G. A., Xu, C., Yu, Z., & Halm, D. S. (2024). The impact of engagement on student learning. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 22–33.
Furumoto, K., Saji, N., & Imai, M. (2025). Teaching skills related to a foundational understanding of fractions. The Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 73(4), 232–247. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep.73.232
Ghosh, S., & Jana, O. (2025). Enhancing student engagement in higher education: Innovative instructional strategies. In Developing student engagement opportunities in higher education. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0644-5.ch001
Gómez, J. D. R., & Rico, S. E. P. (2025). Teaching proportional reasoning based on history and epistemology: An inclusive view. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 30. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-24782025300096
Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Context problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39(1–3). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003749919816
Heilporn, G., Lakhal, S., & Bélisle, M. (2022). Examining effects of instructional strategies on student engagement in blended online courses. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12701
Hettinger, K., Lazarides, R., & Schiefele, U. (2023). Motivational climate in mathematics classrooms: Teacher self-efficacy for student engagement, student- and teacher-reported emotional support and student interest. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 55(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01430-x
Hidi, S. E., & Renninger, K. A. (2026). The four-phase model of interest development: Addressing individual differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2025.102865
Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897
Isnawan, M. G., Zulhidayati, I., Jannah, S. W., Mahirudin, M., & Lidaini, L. (2025). STEAM+X integrated epistemic learning patterns in ratio learning for secondary school students. Edumatica: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.22437/edumatica.v15i3.48090
Jupri, A., & Drijvers, P. (2016). Student difficulties in mathematizing word problems in algebra. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1299a
Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2020). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Pearson.
Kazemi, E., & Hintz, A. (2023). Intentional talk: How to structure and lead productive mathematical discussions. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032681337
Lamon, S. J. (2020). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding: Essential content knowledge and instructional strategies for teachers (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003008057
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage.
Miles, M. P., & Morrison, M. (2020). An effectual leadership perspective for developing rural entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, 54(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0128-z
Mosvold, R. (2024). Research on discussion in mathematics teaching: A review of literature from 2000 to 2020. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811287183_0032
Ni, Y., Shi, L., Cheung, A., Chen, G., Ng, O. L., & Cai, J. (2021). Implementation and efficacy of a teacher intervention in dialogic mathematics classroom discourse in Hong Kong primary schools. International Journal of Educational Research, 107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2021.101758
Nowell, L. (2022). Beyond tradition: Innovative mentorship models for higher education. Papers on Postsecondary Learning and Teaching, 5. https://doi.org/10.55016/ojs/pplt.v5y2022.73209
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 results (Volume III): Creative minds, creative schools. OECD Publishing.
Ölmez, İ. B., Han, J., Hwang, S., & Cai, J. (2025). Mathematical problem-posing research: Revisiting some answered and unanswered questions. Avances de Investigación en Educación Matemática, 28. https://doi.org/10.35763/aiem28.8124
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (2022). Impact-driven qualitative research and evaluation. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research design. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529770278.n71
Pişkin Tunç, M., & Çakıroğlu, E. (2022). Fostering prospective mathematics teachers’ proportional reasoning through a practice-based instruction. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1844909
Purwasi, L. A., Putri, R. I. I., & Susanti, E. (2025). Designing learning trajectory on ratio and proportion through PMRI with the Indonesian traditional food context. Journal of Honai Math, 8(1), 21–42.
Qiu, C., Luu, L., & Stocker, A. A. (2020). Benefits of commitment in hierarchical inference. Psychological Review, 127(4). https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000193
Rahimi, M. (2024). Effects of integrating motivational instructional strategies into a process-genre writing instructional approach on students’ engagement and argumentative writing. System, 121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103261
Reinhold, F., Hofer, S., Berkowitz, M., Strohmaier, A., Scheuerer, S., Loch, F., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Reiss, K. (2020). The role of spatial, verbal, numerical, and general reasoning abilities in complex word problem solving for young female and male adults. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00331-0
Reza, H. S. F., Putri, A. D., & Anuniwat, D. (2026). Realistic mathematics education improves trigonometric ratios: A classroom action research study. SJME (Supremum Journal of Mathematics Education), 10(1), 55–67.
Rojo, M., King, S., Gersib, J., & Bryant, D. P. (2023). Rational number interventions for students with mathematics difficulties: A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221105520
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sari, F. Y., Zulkardi, Z., Putri, R. I. I., Susanti, E., & Nusantara, D. S. (2024). Ratio material learning design using the context of cooking rice to help elementary students understand concepts. INOMATIKA, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v6i1.443
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2011). How we think: A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203843000
Siegler, R. S., & Lortie-Forgues, H. (2017). Hard lessons: Why rational number arithmetic is so difficult for so many people. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(4), 346–351.
Siegler, R. S., & Oppenzato, C. O. (2021). Missing input: How imbalanced distributions of textbook problems affect mathematics learning. Child Development Perspectives, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12402
Sim, S. H., & Matore, M. E. E. M. (2022). The relationship of Grasha–Riechmann teaching styles with teaching experience of National-Type Chinese Primary Schools mathematics teacher. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1028145
Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Moutsios-Rentzos, A. (2024). Proof and proving in school and university mathematics education research: A systematic review. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01518-y
Suh, J., Gallagher, M. A., Capen, L., & Birkhead, S. (2020). Enhancing teachers’ noticing around mathematics teaching practices through video-based lesson study with peer coaching. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLLS-09-2020-0073
Thomsen, M., Jankvist, U. T., & Clark, K. M. (2022). The interplay between history of mathematics and digital technologies: A review. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 54(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01368-0
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, Z., Liu, Y., Wei, L., Ji, J. S., Liu, Y., Liu, R., Zha, Y., Chang, X., Zhang, L., Liu, Q., Zhang, Y., Zeng, J., Dong, T., Xu, X., Zhou, L., He, J., Deng, Y., Zhong, B., & Wu, X. (2022). What are the risk factors of hospital length of stay in the novel coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) patients? A survival analysis in southwest China. PLOS ONE, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261216
Weinberg, P. (2019). Generalizing and proving in an elementary mathematics teacher education program: Moving beyond logic. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(9), em1740.
Wiesner, E., Weinberg, A., Fulmer, E. F., & Barr, J. (2020). The roles of textual features, background knowledge, and disciplinary expertise in reading a calculus textbook. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(2), 204–233.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage.
Yu, D., & Huang, Y. (2025). Characteristics of primary school mathematics classroom discourse for cultivating higher-order thinking: Analysis based on classroom videos of Chinese primary school expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102577
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Azis, Jarnawi Afgani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
